You deleted over 20 ways in this changeset, among them the whole of Penland Island, Brown Island, and Gibby Island. Please fix these problems or ask for help if you cannot do it yourself.

Dear Runkstrumpan, please use proper changeset comments (e.g. "updated forest") and not just "."!

Hello, please do not assign a "name" of "byggnad" to buildings; you have already set the object type to building, that's enough. Only use "name" if the building actually has a name! Same for "Infart".

Hello, you have deleted about 50 buildings in this changeset but they are still visible on aerial imagery. You have not provided a reason for this deletion other than "j" so I assume it must have been a mistake; I am going to revert the deletion.

Has this large-scale addition of foreign keys ("ATP") been discussed anywhere? If not, it is a data import that validates our rules and needs to be (a) stopped and (b) reverted. I doubt that using the all-purpose "ref" would have passed muster in a discussion with the community...?

Dear aleksandra991, when adding new street names please specify the data source so that other mappers can ensure you are not using copyrighted material.

Hello dsmith2, in this changeset you deleted two dozen buildings which are still visible on our current aerial imagery. Have these houses been destroyed, or was this a mistake on your part?

In this changeset you have DELETED existing building outlines from OSM, and replaced them with rectangular areas tagged as "buildings" which are instead the plot boundaries. That is incorrect. Please do not do that. I will revert the edit.

Dear university team, please note the following: (1) if you edit OSM as part of your job or as directed by someone else (eg the university), then please observe our "organised editing guidelines" at https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines which, among other things, ask you to tell us who you are on your profile page. (2) when adding names to OSM, please observe our "name is the name only" rule described on osm.wiki/Names - some names you have specified here ("Central Library 1000 seats", "35 dormitories for teachers" etc.) are *descriptions* and not names. Please correct these names; if the buildings do not have proper names then just leave the name field empty.

Hallo sgnak, bitte gibt in Zukunft an, aus welcher Quelle Du die Information über die Spezialisierung der jewiligen Ärzte entnommen hast.

Please provide a link to the mandatory discussion that formed the basis of this import. I am interested in finding out why the community has agreed to using the "name" tag in a descriptive manner like it has been done here.

Please review this import, it contains many implausible, jagged buildings like osm.org/way/1198553958

Please review this import, it contains many implausible, jagged buildings like osm.org/way/1198545308

DWG agrees, please do not map non-existing railways or revert the deletion of non-existing railways. Ticket#2024031510000304

I have reverted yesterday's changesets. Dear Barroszt, if you intend to update thy cycleway data in OSM for the city, please do so one step at a time like the community requested - do not make uploads that break something and promise to fix it later. Perhaps it would be a good idea to discuss your plans on https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 so that you get a good community buy-in. A DWG colleague of mine has blocked your account after they noticed your reverts; I will lift that block now but if you do further mass edits in this area that leave the map worse than it was before and that lead to complaints from the community, then your account may be blocked again.

In this changeset you have deleted more than 400 buildings, and created many new buildings. Your description "Added Buildings" is therefore insufficient (and please drop #hotosm-project-16341 #osmuganda #missingmaps #gainzone #makererestudents from the changeset comment, it's enough to have that in the "hashtag" tag). Next time you delete buildings please provide an adequate explanation - have they been demolished? Were they wrongly mapped? -- If your motivation is to improve the building geometry, then it is preferred that you improve existing buildings rather than deleting the old ones (and with them any credit due to those who mapped the buildings in a HOT project four years ago).

I note that user Barroszt has reverted my revert of their edits. I trust that they will now already have repaired all the quality problems that they have caused. If, however, they have again introduced problems that they are not repairing, please let me know and I'll revert again & block the account to prevent further deterioration. I would prefer the Polish community to settle this among themselves but I will not allow one person to go against the wishes of everyone else.

Dear user Hemedy, when uploading data to OpenStreetMap, please specify a description of your work in the "changeset comment" field. You are currently marking each of your edits with "youthmapper" which is not useful; try something like "traced buildings" instead. Also, don't hit the upload button on every single building; add a handful or two before you upload.

Dear bouzinac, "Q697217" is not a sufficient description of your edit. Please consider making changeset comments that people who do not know about wikidata can understand.

Dear Yolanda84, please do not put the word "edificaciones" in the "name" field if you add buildings; it is enough to mark the object as a building, you don't have to "name" it too. I have removed the ~150 wrongly placed "name" tags of the buildings you added.