This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism

Not acceptable. Someone who can edit OSM and write changeset comments can also make their point on community.openstreetmap.org.

I will not tolerate further vandalism of this path. Please understand that creating additional accounts to circumvent a DWG block is a violation of our terms and it undermines your credibility in any further discussion.

Blocked user Turid Nordbye in osm.org/user_blocks/15263 as advertised.

Dear Turid Nordbye, in this changeset you have (again) removed a path that you would prefer not to exist (the one that connects Sprengsneset to the path network in the West); extensive community discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-assistance-from-the-norwegian-community-in-the-resolution-of-a-mapping-dispute/104524/38 had previously shown that the community prefers to keep the path.

I have restored the path now. Please do not delete it again, or else your account will have to be suspended for vandalism.

Best regards, Frederik Ramm - OSMF Data Working Group - Ticket#2023102410000017

Dear niccokunzmann, in this changeset you have added a "farm shop" named "cwm Coed y Celyn Farm". What is your source for this edit - were you there and are you sure that this is a shop and carries that name? I am not doubting your data, but the DWG has received a complaint and I would like to point the complainant to the data source. If I could tell them "our volunteers have visited the place in August and that's what it is called" then I'll happily do that. (DWG Ticket#2023101510000071)

There are multiple countries bordering this water body and only one of them is using the (Arabic) name "Persian Gulf". There were lengthy discussions on the OSM talk mailing list about this, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-November/087097.html - the current compromise is that while we use the English name "Persian Gulf", the Arabic name is the equivalent of "Arabic Gulf", and name:fa (the Farsi name) is again the equivalent of "Persian Gulf". Feel free to raise this discussion on the community forum again, but unilateral changes are not acceptable.

Asking in the course of handling DWG ticket Ticket#2023071410000373. If you cannot show a valid source for your edits, please stop adding these names to OSM.

I have asked the other mapper for a source in osm.org/changeset/142002100

Dear Maloss34, in this changeset you re-added the names "Zero", "Asso", and "TNT" to several mountain bike trails. In osm.org/changeset/141477633, mapper Andrea Del Sarto writes that these names are not official. Can you please provide a source (ideally a photo that shows signs on the ground) for your naming?

Dear Andrea Del Sarto, in this changeset you have removed a couple of "name" tags created by user Maloss34, and replaced them with "mtb:name". This kind of editing has been going back and forth for a while. Do you have a reason to believe that his name is wrong, or why are you relegating it to the obscure "mtb:name" tag? What do the signs on the ground say? (Asking as a DWG member, working on Ticket#2023071410000373)

Hey Guillaume, thank you, I'm still getting the knack of this OSM thing. Can you show me where I enter the changeset comment? I have JSOM build 422 on Java SE5. Do I need to upgrade?

Ist das nicht ein bisschen gefährlich, wenn Leute einfach so aufgrund einer Textbeschreibung einen Node in OSM setzen und nachher ist der Defi ganz woanders?

Auf Rückfrage hat man mir seitens der Schulleitung mitgeteilt, dass dort auch nie ein Defi existiert hat, es kann sich also auch nicht um veraltete Daten handeln.

Hallo defikarte_app, der in diesem Changeset angelegte Defibrillator mit der Node-ID 11038063720 existiert lt. einer Email der Schulleitung an den FOSSGIS nicht. Kann man nachvollziehen, wer diesen Defi aus welcher Quelle eingetragen hat und Rückfrage halten, wie es zu dem Missverständnis kommen konnte?

Hallo lberges, immer wieder gibt es Rückfragen zu Deinen Edits, weil Deine Quellen unklar sind. In den Fällen, wo Du Quellen genannt hast, stellt sich oft heraus, dass ihre Verwendung für OSM unzulässig ist. Daher es es unabdingbar, dass Du bei Deinen Beiträgen die tatsächliche Quelle mit angibst, und man Dir das nicht erst alles aus der Nase ziehen muss. Hier zum Beispiel hast Du eine Stadtteilgrenze korrigiert - woher nimmst Du die Information dazu? Wohnst Du in Osnabrück? Hast Du auf irgendeiner Webseite nachgeschaut, wenn ja auf welcher? Sowas gehört in den "source" beim Hochladen und nicht erst in die Diskussion, wenn Dich jemand fragt.

Herr Huber hat recht, auch wenn ich mit seiner forschen Ausdrucksweise etwas unglücklich bin. Straßen, die irgendwer irgendwann vielleicht mal verlegen will, gehören nicht in OSM; wenn jemand eine Karte mit dem angedachten Straßenverlauf erstellen möchte, ist "umap" dafür der richtige Weg.

Previous discussion in Swiss community where it was pointed out that something with one node per metre is not necessarily more "precise" http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/archives/list/talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch/thread/MDNT4XCPD76OAUTMNBPFLN55KZS6FYBY/

Pan, could you explain the technical process you used to create osm.org/relation/3238626 - surely this was not manually traced?