osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

osm.org/user_blocks/16513

How have you managed to capture house numbers from the quoted source "Esri World Imagery"?

Hello there, in this changeset you introduced - among other things - a highway named "B6443" which according to available imagery seems to cross straight across farmland in many places. Were you aware that these changes are uploaded to the global map used by everybody else - or did you attempt to create a "private" map for your own use? If the latter, the method you have chosen was unsuitable; have a look at umap.openstreetmap.fr which lets you "scribble" onto an OSM background and generate private maps. I will remove your edits from OSM now to avoid confusion, though if it turns out that some are worth keeping we can re-instate them later. Cheers, Frederik (DWG Ticket Ticket#2024072710000187 )

In this changeset you have mapped a rectangular roof of a few square feet as a 6-member multipolygon: osm.org/relation/17854639. Can you explain the reasoning behind that? It seems overly complex and will likely put anyone else off touching that building...

Dear dmr090909, please stop creating military areas with a name tag of "currently controlled by X". The name tag is for the name only, and not for a description of who controls it. This information can go into other tags - provided that the areas in question are actually "military landuse" at all.

Please do not abuse the "name" tag to place messages on the map. If these are military areas that have a name then put these names in the "name" tag - "currently controlled by X" is not an appropriate name tag.

On a separate note, osm.org/way/1285442977 is inside Armenia. Why does it have to be pointed out that it is controlled by Armenia?

When making these "currently controlled by ..." claims, please add a source to your changeset so that others can independently verify the situation.

Hi there, the combination of access=no, foot=private, motor_vehicle=designated makes no sense and might actually lead to the road being open for motorised transport in some routing engines. I think that a combination of access=no, psv=yes could make more sense (if taxis are also allowed), or access=no, bus=yes (if only buses). Perhaps check with the talk-ca mailing list to be sure.

Hallo Garmin-User, wenn Du etwas revertierst, gib doch bitte den Grund an. Wenn der Benutzer einfach nur ein "reverted" vor den Latz geknallt kriegt, wie soll er dann künftig sein Verhalten verbessern?

Dear ziki0405, in this changeset you have modified the boundaries of Germany and the Czech Republic, as well as 18 others. I would expect more information about this than just "NEW POINT". Please use changeset comments that describe in a little more detail what you edited, and also what source the edit was based on.

Hi there, did you really happen to know the elevation of this hill ("source=user knowledge") or was this source tag a left-over from some other edit?

Dear Rngrk, many of the objects you have created claiming "Bing" as a source are not visible on Bing imagery, for example the "grassland" areas osm.org/way/1262193068 and osm.org/way/1262191652. Are you sure that the source for this was Bing imagery?

Dear Rohitashav Aggarwal, please consider using changeset comments that are understandable by other humans participating in the project. "#hotosm-project-16842 #CanCross #CRC #MissingMaps" doesn't say anything about your intentions with this upload; "added buildings in High River, Alberta" would have been much more useful!

Dear Pablo, please check the builidings in this changeset, their outline looks improbable. Also, it is a good habit to add human-readable changeset comments - nobody in OSM knows what "#hotosm-project-17103 LACH_VE_FL_2024 #Humanitarianprogram " is supposed to mean.

What about the ~50 buildings in the center of this box - you left them in but on aerial imagery it looks like they might have been demolished too?

Hallo nenemeister, Du bist offensichtlich schon länger bei OSM dabei und nicht erst seit dem 1.7. - ich würde empfehlen, so einen umfassenden Edit, wie Du ihn hier durchführst, im Community-Forum zu diskutieren. Vielleicht findet sich da dann auch ein Konsens für eine automatische Umsetzung, dann sparst Du Dir die Handarbeit mit Overpass und JOSM.

Ich habe das Problem in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/buslinien-fleissarbeit-in-mank-no/115283 erwähnt und ein anderer Benutzer hat die Haltestellen korrigiert. Wenn Dir noch etwas auffällt, kannst Du es dort im Forum zur Sprache bringen.