Can you send me a photo of one of those paper maps of the area that also feature this path? I could then send that to the complainant.

Ok, thank you. So you have recorded the track with GPS, is that correct? Because one thing that the land owner complains about is that it goes straight through a building (see overlay on http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/1330381380.jpg) - maybe the lack of GPS accuracy could explain that problem?

Dear DanieleOSM, the OSMF data working group has received a complaint about osm.org/way/1330381380 which a land owner says does not exist. I looked at the aerial imagery and I must say it doesn't look like there is a path. You added it claiming source=survey - are you sure?

Da haben wir uns überschnitten - s. osm.org/user_blocks/17233

In the future when you make any contributions to OSM, please use a better description than "Updating and resolving issues" so that others may see what you are up to. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please do not make changes to the names of the Persian Gulf. Under the harmless guise of "Updating and resolving issues" you have removed many names that in some way referred to "Arabic" even though they were only recorded as alternative names. I have reverted your edit.

Dear YaaRamis, "sadgasagdasdag" is not a sufficient explanation for the deleting of large swaths of farmland. Please explain your intentions.

In all your future changesets, please fill the changeset comment field with a human-readable explanation of what you did - see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for background. (Of course a comment in Turkish is perfectly fine. But neither "sadgasagdasdag" nor "asdga" or "sdfkgsfdg" are.)

Community-Diskussion angestoßen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mit-id-hinzugefugte-wikidata-tags-in-hamburg/125506

Hallo Wolfgang Holtz, bitte vertraue nicht blind dem, was der ID-Editor Dir als angebliche "Datenprobleme" oder "veraltete Tags" auflistet. Ändere diese Dinge nur dann, wenn Du selbst der Ansicht bist, dass die Änderung sinnvoll ist. Das gilt insbesondere auch für das Hinzufügen von Wikipedia/Wikidata-Tags.

Mir ist das auch aufgefallen, und ich habe in osm.org/changeset/162273867 darum gebeten, das künftig zu unterlassen. Ich werde auch mit einem Skript alle von sundew entfernten Wikidata-Tags ermitteln und ggf. automatisch wiederherstellen (je nachdem, wie viele zusammenkommen).

Hallo sundew, bitte unterlasse unbedingt in Zukunft die Löschung von "operator:wikidata" und ähnlichen Wiki-Tags, ausser dann, wenn sie nachweislich falsch sind. Ich weiss, dass du sie unnötig findest, und Du darfst auch gern darauf verzichten, sie zu erfassen, wenn Du einen neuen Briefkasten o.ä. einträgst, aber wenn Du diese Tags löschst, die jemand anders eingetragen hat, dann übersteigst Du damit Deine Kompetenzen als (wohlgeschätzter) "Lokaler Experte" und wirst zum (unerwünschten) "Lokalfürsten". Ich schreibe Dir diese Nachricht in meiner Rolle als Mitglied der Data Working Group und weise vorsichtshalber darauf hin, dass ein Ignorieren dieser Bitte zum Revertieren von ganzen Changesets führen kann, auch wenn diese anderswo postive Beiträge enthalten.

Dear user Bąbel, please improve your changeset comments. It appears that all your changeset comments are something along the lines of "adding data for 2D/3D", but when I look at your edits they often don't even have anything to do with any 2D/3D stuff - in this changeset for example you removed the tag "residential=urban" from a hotel compound. How is this "uzupełnienie danych pod 2D"? - In general, any changeset comment that can easily apply to more than half of your edits is unlikely to be good. Please read osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian (DWG Ticket#2025020810000229)

Dear Poseidon66, you have deleted too many things in your recent changesets - things that still appear to be there according to aerial imagery. And instead of giving a good reason for your deletions in the "changeset comment" field, all you are telling us is meaningless stuff like "1.2", "1.3". That is not sufficient explanation for such far-reaching deletions, hence I am reverting them now. (DWG Ticket#2025020710000589)

Dear MenKauRa, in this changeset you have added a "Villa Saleh Mammadov (Azeravtoyol ASC)" and a "Villa Alirza Suleymanov (ADY ASC)" as tourism destinations. Can you supply evidence for these locations actually being advertised as tourist apartments or motels? The DWG has a complaint saying that you are abusing OSM to publish personal information about politicians. Please explain. DWG Ticket#2025020710000598

Dear MenKauRa - "roads and objects editing" is not a good changeset comment. Also no need to prefix your comment with "az_07-02-25", as the date is automatically recorded.

Dear farhadGuli, while we value local knowledge in OpenStreetMap, your hostility is not warranted. Every mapper in OpenStreetMap may map in any country they want. If someone makes a mistake mapping in your area, then make it clear to them what the mistake is so that they can do better next time. Don't say things like "go away and map in your country", it reflects badly on you.

osm.org/relation/18608914 contains both a via point and a via way - is that intentional?

I have now restored those buildings that were deleted and not yet re-drawn: osm.org/changeset/161898314

Dear user Mastodont, please don't add fictional data to OSM. You can use opengeofiction.net if you want to play; OpenStreetMap is for serious contributions only. Your data has been removed by the community.

Dear easymapper, what is "OSM_Location_Editor" and is it possible that you are doing what we call a "mechanical edit" (editing lots of objects without actually looking at what you're doing)? How is this building in Bangladesh a "site=superfund" and what does that even mean?