Any kind of automated editing must be discussed with the community in advance, see osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct - also, can you specify a source for the city of Hinda now being called "Joe ndi ndani"?

Can you specify a source for the existence of "West Madrid University"?

MTB FORIS, clearly you have invested a lot of time and money to establish a proper organisation and set up physical infrastructure and so on. That is laudable but it does not give you a monopoly about mountain biking in the region. Other people - individuals, hobbyists, non-organised people without any club, without a leader, without structure - have the same rights as you to use their mountain bikes and to record trails that exist on the ground in OSM. Just because you are the only recognized club doesn't mean that only your trails can be on the map. @sava eskimo we will review the material. @both please do not resort to name calling on OSM or we will block you both.

Mateusz, I think the local mappers have this situation under control and it is not helpful at all if mappers from far away add fuel to the fire.

save eskimo, please provide evidence about the physical existence of the "Evolution downhill 1" and "Evoution downhill 2" routes. We would be looking for photos of clear, on-the-ground signage. If these routes are not visible on the ground and not clearly visible then they cannot be in OSM. (The same is, of course, true for any "MTB Foris" routes.)

MTB FORIS, you are clearly deleting information that belongs to a competitor of yours. You have a massive conflict of interest here. You are not a neutral party. In the future, if you find that members of "Evolution" have created paths that you do not agree with, please report them to DWG and we will investigate. Do not delete anything yourself; we will interpret that as vandalism.

I have a question about osm.org/way/919145419 - on the aerial imagery it looks as if this was a little stream with trees along it. Is this a bike trail on the ground? For a bike trail to exist in OSM it must be verifiable on the ground. Someone must be able to go there and say: Yep, clearly this is "Evolution trail 2". If this is NOT the case - if "Evolution trail 2" is just something that someone has drawn on a map, like "you can ride your bike here", but on the ground there is no signage and nothing, then it is difficult to map it as a MTB trail in OSM.

I have blocked the user after he replied to my previous message with more abuse.

In this changeset you have added a secondary road which bears no resemblance to anything visible in aerial imagery.

In this changeset you have added over overlapping and 400 oddly-shaped buildings in a field in Australia (not Sierra Leone).

In this changeset you have removed the Chinese name from osm.org/way/917237315. If such actions are performed by a new user, they smack of nationalist map fiddling which is something we don't like. I can see that the structure is on the Indian-controlled side of the border, but you should have at least copied the Chinese name into name:zh instead of removing it altogether. Please do not use OpenStreetMap to make political statements or claims.

Hello NMYR, can you explain this edit and the source for it?

Hello, in this changeset and others you made today, you have deleted thousands of objects from OSM, causing a lot of damage to the map. Other mapppers have repaired the damage but please be careful not to do this again! Additionally, your changeset comments should describe in a human-readable form what the aim of your edit is. Your changeset comment of "#gomicron21twsg;#gomicron21tw;#gomicron21twf11meprod" is gibberish that nobody can understand!

Please, when updating lots of names in the future, specify your data source. If you just add a name or two then it might be that you simply know them, but you've added hundreds of name:zh tags, i.e. it is likely that you copied them from somewhere. That "somewhere" should be in your changeset source tag.

Please let me know (at data@osmfoundation.org) when a good change is undone again and we will look into it.

fayor, you see to be engaged in an edit war here about the highway tag. osm.org/way/401521196/history has gone through four different highway types in the last couple of months. I see a pattern here where you do not discuss edits with other people, you just make them as if you own the map. Don't do that. Seek the discussion, if not in a changeset discussion then on the talk-it mailing list, and arrive at a consensus. You cannot just override everyone else all the time.

Dear user fayor, it appears that you are frequently reverting the contributions of other users, e.g. in this changeset someone had added information about the lack of road markings and cycleways and you simply removed that with a comment of "Correzione modifiche". Don't do that. The edit was not incorrect, it was not necessary of you to "correct" it, and if you believe there was a problem, you should have taken it up in a changeset discussion with the person who made the edit.

I have removed a very offensive comment here. MiejscowościPL, if you continue to add fictional data or spew abuse at those who fix the errors that you introduce, your account will be blocked. (DWG Ticket#2021041110000155)

Bitte bei der Umbenennung der Hindenburgstraße strikt nach den aktuellen Straßenschildern vorgehen und nicht nach Presseberichten; offenbar ist das Thema ja noch nicht ganz durch! Nach der Umbenennung kann der Hindenburg dann ja in old_name.

Bitte etwas vorsichtiger mit dem Begriff "Vandalismus". Eine vorschnelle Eintragung einer geplanten Umbenennung ist sicherlich keiner.