OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

When 'connectivity fixes' aren't fixes.

z-dude님이 English로 2010년 10월 5일에 게시함.

osm.org/?lat=49.252838&lon=-122.907122&zoom=18

Deleted node.
osm.org/browse/node/814490914/history

Sometimes 'connectivity fix' scripts break things for routing. One case is due to human nature (not tagging a bridge for several reasons )

User 1 (me) adds a pair of trails, but doesn't specifically add a bridge.

User 2 (someone else) does a 'connectivity fixes' run, and ends up connecting 2 trails which aren't really connected.

This then results in a map website creating a route which has a user cycle halfway across a bridge, and then jump 50 feet below to a walking trail because it's a 'shorter route'.

I've since tagged that section of bike trail as a bridge, but have seen other issues where mapping websites generate routes that have users also jumping off bridges.
I think most of it comes down to human nature. You map out a track but forget, or don't realize that you actually crossed a bridge when riding.

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2010년 10월 6일 15:39Vclaw님의 의견

Worth checking your local area on keep right: http://keepright.ipax.at/
It warns of "intersections without junctions", ie places where ways cross without sharing nodes. So these should either have a junction, or a bridge/tunnel mapped.

I'd agree that is not helpful to do "connectivity fixes" in areas you are not familiar with, best to check on the ground if there's a bridge or not.

2010년 10월 8일 20:03Sundance님의 의견

layer= can help too, 0 is inferred and does not need to specified

0 ground
1 bridge
2 bridge on top of another bridge (freeway interchange for example)
-1 tunnel

2010년 10월 14일 06:44mbiker_imports_and_more님의 의견

Sorry for the "typo". I definitely have been around that place before, but may not remember the exact geometry by now.

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요