👍

Hi, thanks for your contributitions to #climbing in osm.

I just noticed, that your description on osm.org/way/1412929399 got probably unintentionally cropped to 255 characters.

Kind regards, zbycz from openclimbing.org

Hi Mateusz, thanks for you care of the data! Yes this was definitely a typo. I fixed it now.

Kind regards, Pavel from osmapp.org

Všechny climbing=* objekty by měly mít nadřazený tag `sport=climbing`.

via https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1113#issuecomment-1937003835

Done here: osm.org/changeset/147613575

Wiki: osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons:path#More_images

Thanks @mueschel. We changed all our occurences to the :1 version.

via osm.org/changeset/147273712

cc @jvaclavik

Thanks for the additional info. Let's go with ":1" here as well then. I will change the tags in all (our) existing objects and on the wiki page of path.

Well, in that case - we can go with "wikimedia_commons:1" and "wikimedia_commons:1:path". That perhaps looks a little better.

Btw, can you link the tags:1 which are approved? I don't know how to find it :) In taginfo i looked for "image", "url" etc. but they are not that significant.

Also should we start with :1 or :2 ? 🙂🤔

Hi, thanks for your feedback, appreciated. :)

According to this wiki page osm.wiki/Multiple_values
suffixes are fine. Unfortunately, we can't use semicolons, first because it would hit 255 chars limit, and second, because we need to accompany each image with `:path` tag - see osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons:path

The MV rules document several suffixes, and let the user decide. I searched through taginfo and found just "*1" more common than "*_1". But I am open to use any of those two.

I don't particulary favor "*:1", becuase colons are often use for subtags - which this is not.

Documented here: osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons:path

Joo, tak super. Já jsem to hledal jen přes fultext a tam mi to našlo nějakou relaci bez tagů, jen se jménem. Tak jsem raději napsal :)

A nádvoří koukam vypadá dobře! 👍
Vida, area:highway jsem asi ani neznal. Dík.

Vypadá to že tenhle changeset smazal relaci katedrály. Zatím jsem to nezkoumal, ale raději se ptám jestli to je ok.

osm.org/relation/3367914/history

thumbs up :-)

Looks beatiful: http://openstreetmap.cz/#map=10/49.5902/18.3801&layers=A