Dear user someone123457,

a number of other mappers have made comments on your contributions. Each of these should have generated an email to your account, and you are expected to reply to these. If you have received these messages and chosen to ignore them, please don’t do that in the future. If you have not received these messages, please verify that OSM has your correct email address and that these messages are not ending up in a spam filter.

Please review the messages you have received at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=20934066 and post public responses to them (by clicking on the changeset numbers and then adding a comment in the comment field).

In your future mapping, please observe the following rules: * do not add “historic” information (even when correctly tagged as historic). Only add information about things that are visible on the ground today. * only add “proposed” roads or features if the proposals have cleared the administrative process and are very likely to go ahead; do not add “proposed” things that are one of many proposals, or that may or may not been built. * use good changeset comments. “road updates” is not a proper changeset comment for a changeset that adds landuse areas. * do not use the name tag for descriptions of things and do not use all-caps in names (e.g. HOLLAND’S ADDITION).

Thank you
Frederik Ramm
OSMF Data Working Group
Ticket#2024032810000012