FYI: https://osmcal.org/event/1449/

Fixed

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/123692634

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/123692634

linlin15您好
您所作的编辑对于OpenStreetMap是破坏行为

请您务必做到：

1. 不要随意删除其他人已经绘制好的物件，并停止这种破坏行为。OSM是一个反应现实状况的地图。

2. 请使用有意义的变更集注释，这有助于他人了解您正在做什么

---

注意到您是在上一个编辑后2小时进行的本次编辑。这一点都不好玩，只会徒增其他志愿者的工作量，消耗别人的时间，请不要再这样做！

Hey, linlin15

注意到您使用的是简体中文编辑器，因此接下来我用简体中文和您沟通。

首先非常感谢您来到OpenStreetMap，但请您注意使用有意义的变更集注释，仅仅”11“不能起到任何作用
其他人无法从这里面看出您做出了什么样的操作

此外，请不要删除其他编辑者的贡献，例如您删除了内环南线周围立交桥，这是非常不礼貌也不合理的。

我将会回退它，望您接下来注意自己的编辑行为，本着于他人合作的目的。

BJMTR 你好，有其他编辑者反映你在高速岔路口的编辑不够妥当

osm.wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

这是目前关于此类岔口信息标注的文档，以供参考。

朋友你好，在中国境内的要素name通常只填写name:zh对应的简体中文名，详情可见
osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#China

感谢您的贡献

If you have some method can let this so-called investigate speed fast and make things clearly, I thank you sincerely. ♥

Hey Daniel

Thank you for noticing this and talk with me. Actually this is not me treated unfairly by DWG, but the honorable "on the ground" rule unfairly treated by some DWG member.

Thank you for listen this long story.

As we all know, the terrirory disputed area should follow the on the ground rule, no matter which one is seen adjective or evil.

Here are 2 changeset:

+ osm.org/changeset/111484120
+ osm.org/changeset/111486876

The disputed changeset related on a boundary change between Bhutan-China, in this area a small viliage can been seen on satelite map. This places is now controled by China, if some one search the "Pangda viliage" on google he/she will immediately know everything.

But DWG just "invastigating" and "invastigating", without any result, just let this area locked, and add strange tag: "fixme=What's this".

If something related to China, usually it will cost a long long long period time to handle than other place. Even some DWG member show there injustice about China mapper.

> In a twist to usual OSM rules (“local mappers know best”), in order to give Chinese users the best map, it might be best if citizens of China refrained from editing anything of international interest (including China’s borders) - or really anything their own government might have an opinion on.

This part of quote is from woodpack said in osm.org/user/assanges/diary/397559 (Also you can see osm.org/user/ztzthu/diary/397732 , this is a pair of diary). He show the prejudice of seeing every China mapper as a governmental dominated tool person.

I don't think they will give justice about the fact, maybe the fact don't be care at all, them just want to use those changeset to show their aititude about China.

----

Utill the issue handle was taken equal between China and other places, utill they finished the so-called "invastigate" according to currently situation and on the ground fact, I will NOT change my f-word.

Even DWG can block me, can kick me off OSM, but on the ground fact will not change. I respect every mapper contributing in OSM, even they are doing unproper edit or making some mistake, I think this can be handled in a peaceful way. But acted as admin, acted as part of DWG, they, at least those 2 DWG member handle this issue, lost the justice.

If my word is offensive, those admin's inaction and prejudice is also offensive to all hardworking and disciplined China mapper. I can't bare this.

I don't want to larger this to all DWG member, but at least, on this issue, I don't think they right.

That's why I want to FUCK DWG (No cencored, it is FUCK)

It is interesting that changeset 123456789 ( osm.org/changeset/123456789 ) just reached in 4 days ago.

That means OSM is growing rapidly, a good news.

注意到您已经在

osm.org/changeset/121930521

osm.org/changeset/122365870

被先后两位其他编辑者询问您的变更集注释

自那时起您一直使用“test”、“111”作为变更集注释，可以认为您并不在意与其他人的合作。

中国有句古话，“再一再二不再三”，算上我应该是第三次有编辑者对您提出质疑。因此您的行为将被移送至数据工作小组处理。

朋友您好，请使用有意义的变更集注释，不要使用无意义的1111作为填充，这不利于其他朋友了解到您正在进行什么工作。OSM是一个用户之间互相合作的平台，若您不加改正，您可能会被封禁，您做出的不当贡献也可能会被移除。

请您务必正视此事，期待您的回复。

比较好奇，何谓拯救性修改

---

（另：欢迎加入OSMChina讨论群，https://t.me/osmchina ）

let's bless this lucky guy! \o/

"H" is wrong typing……

What I wanna to say is "Horqin, Inner Mongolia AR"

您好，注意到您在林芝将一些居民小区从landuse=residential改为了place=neighbourhood，我建议您在编辑前留意一下 osm.wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97

感谢理解

Oh, I'm not familiar with more than 1 name used situation, if this is documented on OSM wiki, just change

Sorry, those 2 tag were not added by me, but “wenge” means the 10 years “Cultural Revolution” time period, I guess, as a native Chinese.

Maybe that means the name of specific street in that period of time.

确实，您说到点上了，中文区的文档目前一直非常不够完善（并且不是这一两年的问题，是好多年一直以来就缺人。因为我们肯定不能照搬英国的标准和语义来，各国都有国情；但又不希望它是国标的复刻，也不想完全依照规划去走（全国各地规划的保守程度不同，资料开放程度也不同，有的地方还喜欢自造新词，更不可取），目前社区内唯规划派的也有、唯车道的也有、更侧重道路路况和更侧重功能均衡的各种理念一直以来就从未调和过，这确实是我们一直欠缺的。北京的五环以内到底算不算高速，就辩论过不止一次。（并且未来依然可能继续再被提起）

从这个角度讲，有新血液加入是好事。（或者就我们先搁置道路标准的争议，有新的就先画，现存的就先不去做大规模调整）

至少在小范围的居民区级别，小区级别，道路等级还算没有争议的。