OpenStreetMap
the number of illuminated streets is rapidly growing:
http://toolserver.org/~osm/styles/?zoom=2&lat=0&lon=0&layers=B000F0TF0000F0FFFF
Do you want to illuminate your street as well?
Just add lit=yes, if there is light (or lit=no, if there is no light)
讨论
craigloftus 于 2010年12月 6日 18:56 的评论
Any thoughts on whether there should be any implied lit=yes for certain types of highway?
For example, in the UK it is relatively rare for a residential road to be without street lighting, to the extent that the presence to lighting is used to 'regulate' speed limits.
Sanderd17 于 2010年12月 6日 19:18 的评论
in Belgium, I only know 2 unclassified highways which aren't lit, so you may make Belgium completely lit :P
In any case: every residential, primary, secondary, tertiary, motroway or trunk highway is lit, there are only exceptions on the unclassified higways.
Sanderd17 于 2010年12月 6日 19:21 的评论
check this thread: http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7569&start=0
Pink Duck 于 2010年12月 6日 19:54 的评论
Perhaps you could render highway=street_lamp as point light sources?
Pink Duck 于 2010年12月 6日 19:56 的评论
(except where lit=no on them)
marscot 于 2010年12月 6日 20:34 的评论
I add this tag all the time for road paths car parks, I found a few residential roads unlit too
victorferreira 于 2010年12月 8日 16:08 的评论
Actually, this is not a rule ererywere in the planet. In many places the lighting is not coincidentall with the "street", so i think it's not a good way of doing it. The lighting should come from some kind of "street-lamp" tag not a tag for the way.