OpenStreetMap 開放街圖
the number of illuminated streets is rapidly growing:
http://toolserver.org/~osm/styles/?zoom=2&lat=0&lon=0&layers=B000F0TF0000F0FFFF
Do you want to illuminate your street as well?
Just add lit=yes, if there is light (or lit=no, if there is no light)
討論
由 craigloftus 於 2010年12月 6日 18時56分 發表的評論
Any thoughts on whether there should be any implied lit=yes for certain types of highway?
For example, in the UK it is relatively rare for a residential road to be without street lighting, to the extent that the presence to lighting is used to 'regulate' speed limits.
由 Sanderd17 於 2010年12月 6日 19時18分 發表的評論
in Belgium, I only know 2 unclassified highways which aren't lit, so you may make Belgium completely lit :P
In any case: every residential, primary, secondary, tertiary, motroway or trunk highway is lit, there are only exceptions on the unclassified higways.
由 Sanderd17 於 2010年12月 6日 19時21分 發表的評論
check this thread: http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7569&start=0
由 Pink Duck 於 2010年12月 6日 19時54分 發表的評論
Perhaps you could render highway=street_lamp as point light sources?
由 Pink Duck 於 2010年12月 6日 19時56分 發表的評論
(except where lit=no on them)
由 marscot 於 2010年12月 6日 20時34分 發表的評論
I add this tag all the time for road paths car parks, I found a few residential roads unlit too
由 victorferreira 於 2010年12月 8日 16時08分 發表的評論
Actually, this is not a rule ererywere in the planet. In many places the lighting is not coincidentall with the "street", so i think it's not a good way of doing it. The lighting should come from some kind of "street-lamp" tag not a tag for the way.