OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

Nyköping status completed!

Abbe98님이 English로 2014년 12월 7일에 게시함.

This post was first published 26th October 2014 at my blog.

Untill today Nyköping has been having the status of “decent”. The list of cities in Sweden and their status can be found on the Wiki(WikiProject Sweden/Cities). After many hours of mapping yesterday, I changed the status to “completed”(for car navigation). The description of the completed status states “All public roads should be mapped. Roads should be tagged with name and driving restrictions should be fully mapped.”.

I decided when I saw the status table at the wiki yesterday that the task for the weekend should be to make sure that Nyköping could be given the status completed. I saw it as a easy task as we have been spending a loot of time on mapping buildings downtown but I did knew that some roads was missing names so I used the “QA” tool to check for roads without names. I think I added about 70 missing names, much more then I had thought of. I also discovered that in the eastern part of Nyköping there was black areas where roads were missing. The areas had no aerial imagery. I went to sleep late that night, mapping about 30 new roads without aerial imagery. I think the result become as good as it can be anyway.

iD is our main editor and it's available under WTFPL.

위치: Marieberg, Nyköping, Nyköpings kommun, Södermanland County, 611 39, Sweden
이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2014년 12월 8일 06:49escada님의 의견

That’s a nice job. No doubt about that.

But I have some problem with those complete lists. Streets are added, get another layout, etc. all the time. Such a static table is outdated before you know. IMHO it gives a bad impression for new mappers. They might think nothing has to be done anymore.

Furthermore, just names and the street layout is not “completed for car navigation. What about turn restrictions, one way street, lanes, turn lanes, directions. A modern car navigation needs all of that.

I hope that this does not sound to harsh. I really think it is a nice job that you did, however, it is never finished.

2014년 12월 9일 21:45Zorac님의 의견

Regarding the strip that isn’t covered by Bing imagery. You can use Mapbox satellite imagery instead.

2014년 12월 9일 22:03Abbe98님의 의견

@escada I didn’t quote the entire status state, one ways, turn restrictions and counting is mapped… The entire Wiki(at least most of it) is static and it requires a active community just as entire OSM project. About new mappers I can see a major issue with the static status tables, maybe a automated overpass “status check” could be a alternative? Has been considering working on something like that… Right now I think the status tables is great as they set goals for local mappers…

@Zorac the Mapbox Satellite Imagery is almost useless in major parts of Sweden because Mapbox is only using open licensed imagery and here we have almost none of it thanks to laws… For example if you want to publish your own imagery you haft to first ask the defense authorities.

2014년 12월 10일 19:56Zorac님의 의견

@Abbe98 I am aware of that but in this instance the Mapbox covers the part that is missing in Bing. Although not to the same zoom level. This is also true for some parts of the coastline.

2014년 12월 15일 13:27Abbe98님의 의견

@zorac I wasn’t aware of this. Do you know why the zoom level is limited?

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요