Hi again. This 'shop' is not verifiable by anyone visiting the location.
I know it to be a residential house, not a shop with any publicly accessible premises.
Temporary objects like vehicles should not be mapped either.
Hope that helps.
Alex

No problem, I can revert those changes for you.
I think the van can still be seen as advertising as we're only supposed to only map permanent objects.
Cheers.

Hello there. I know this to be a residential property. It is best only map company's that have a publicly visitable address, otherwise it is seen as advertising and should not be included on OSM. Thanks, Alex

No problem! Many such cases... :)

I will amend these so they are entrance nodes as described here - osm.wiki/Key:addr:flats.
Thanks, Alex

Ah very nice... I did start this, but you must have a more automated way of tagging :)

Just a heads up that Bexhill is (mostly) aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels. Bing is slightly unaligned here.

FYI the name St. Andrews Place is already tagged as the addr:housename. I've added the tags "amenity:1900-2011=place_of_worship" and "building:1900-2011=church" for better clarity.

Thanks! If you know any other postcodes feel free to add them :)

Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways?

Thanks for adding those missing houses. I have learnt the road is called is called 'Rohan Ascent', would you happen to know why?

Nice to put it into Combe Haven into a relation. Glad you put the name back on though, useful to see what it is!
I have traced the waterway back to the Mill Wood area, and thinking about it now, it is more of a stream until it passes under Haven Brook Avenue. I'll fix that.

Thanks for updating the map, that is very useful :)

I've reverted those changes in 158446794 and added a note for future mappers so they are aware. Thanks.

Sorry, this is wrong. These are not soccer pitch areas. Just small goal posts used by children and teenagers.

In February this year I started to add individual residential gardens in the Bexhill area. However I have realised when this tag is overused adjacent parks and green-spaces become indistinct and some renderers have broken (https://wikimap.toolforge.org/?lat=50.85&lon=0.47&zoom=12&lang=en&wp=false). I understand we are not mapping for the renderer but until a time comes where this tag is better represented I feel it would be pertinent remove these for now. Happy to discuss further.

Heh, indeed - very useful under power lines and along broad footpaths.

I'll stick a informal=yes on it for now. Cheers.

I wonder if that track around the back of the tip is still accessible, especially with motorcycle training moving there? Walked through there a few years ago and it was pretty overgrown then.

Must have happened on Monday, another bank gone!
I've fixed those tags. Thanks.