Bexhill-OSM's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
168839500 | 22 days ago | Hi again. This 'shop' is not verifiable by anyone visiting the location.
|
168236426 | about 1 month ago | No problem, I can revert those changes for you.
|
168236426 | about 1 month ago | Hello there. I know this to be a residential property. It is best only map company's that have a publicly visitable address, otherwise it is seen as advertising and should not be included on OSM. Thanks, Alex |
166886567 | 2 months ago | No problem! Many such cases... :) |
166886567 | 2 months ago | I will amend these so they are entrance nodes as described here - osm.wiki/Key:addr:flats.
|
164872833 | 4 months ago | Ah very nice... I did start this, but you must have a more automated way of tagging :) |
160719274 | 7 months ago | Just a heads up that Bexhill is (mostly) aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels. Bing is slightly unaligned here. |
160651494 | 7 months ago | FYI the name St. Andrews Place is already tagged as the addr:housename. I've added the tags "amenity:1900-2011=place_of_worship" and "building:1900-2011=church" for better clarity. |
160519476 | 7 months ago | Thanks! If you know any other postcodes feel free to add them :) |
159600522 | 8 months ago | Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways? |
159376011 | 9 months ago | Thanks for adding those missing houses. I have learnt the road is called is called 'Rohan Ascent', would you happen to know why? |
159180607 | 9 months ago | Nice to put it into Combe Haven into a relation. Glad you put the name back on though, useful to see what it is!
|
158482811 | 9 months ago | Thanks for updating the map, that is very useful :) |
158446794 | 9 months ago | I've reverted those changes in 158446794 and added a note for future mappers so they are aware. Thanks. |