Bexhill-OSM's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
125376764 | almost 3 years ago | The sign can be seen just past the driveway - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199221988591840&focus=photo |
125376764 | almost 3 years ago | I believe the no_right_turn restriction is in reference to Albert Road (a one-way street), not the small service driveway? |
122248611 | about 3 years ago | I also set these roads to narrow=yes, but I guess StreetComplete doesn't give you the option. I'll set it next time I do an update. |
114040921 | over 3 years ago | Sounds a good resolution. I've gone and split the schools as best I can, hopefully I got the URPN's the right way round.
|
118881456 | over 3 years ago | Ahh, thanks for the clarification! |
118881456 | over 3 years ago | Hi, any reason why you have changed the rail bridge geometries to only suspended areas, not including supports? osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge clearly shows it should be mapped as a whole. |
114116518 | over 3 years ago | Nice. I do love a bit of sneaky solar :) |
114101623 | over 3 years ago | Hey thanks! You have a good eye :) |
113631812 | over 3 years ago | Yeah I wasn't sure, hence I why flipflopped. Checking through the wiki, MP mentioned it was best used for holes. But I'll revert the change since boundary makes more sense.
|
113255342 | almost 4 years ago | Careful with copy and pasting opening hours, they are not always in the right format. I've fixed this for you. |
113255191 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks, for the edit. This building is just one within the Bexhill Hospital grounds known as the Health Centre. I hope you don't mind me reverting your edit and using the information you've added to the correct way. Alex |
112774736 | almost 4 years ago | Hello! Newer Bing Aerial Imagery has a terrible offset round Bexhill, it's better to use osmuk cadastral parcels here. Hope you don't mind me reverting the change.
|
110642200 | almost 4 years ago | Okay, wrong changeset, but it applies in general |
110642200 | almost 4 years ago | Please be careful with the geometry, bing isn't well aligned, better to use osmuk cadastral parcels |
110626072 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks for the spelling correction. No need to name the pitch, the recreation ground that surround it covers that :) |
110480588 | almost 4 years ago | The wiki says to put maxheight on ways after a height_restrictor. Although the way isn't restricted as after you leave the barrier, it might make the restriction more obvious when routing? What do you think? |
108277865 | about 4 years ago | Hi there, any reason for changing this tag? Using the prefix 'contact' on phone numbers is a preference for all places in Bexhill. Cheers. |
107663455 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for the clarification Mike, much appreciated :) |
107663455 | about 4 years ago | Hi, correct me if I am wrong, but I assumed that by adding the designated foot and cycle path that goes along south of this road, routing for foot traffic could be removed from the road itself? Thanks,
|
107315812 | about 4 years ago | Hello! Newer Bing Aerial Imagery has a terrible offset round Bexhill, it's better to use osmuk cadastral parcels here. Hope you don't mind me reverting the change. |