OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70418808 about 6 years ago

A fair judgement.
I'll pop them back though, useful for our accessibility maps :)
Cheers,
Alex

70418808 about 6 years ago

Sorry, I should be referencing your previous changeset, here's the two nodes in question:
osm.org/node/4899649120
osm.org/node/4899649121

70418808 about 6 years ago

Hi Nathan, I noticed you have deleted some unmarked crossings with tacktile_paving which is important for our accessibility. Any reason? Should I be marking these in a different way?
Thanks,
Alex

68902560 over 6 years ago

I'm just reverting your changeset as there were some tagging issues, but will resurvey and update your location tomorrow.

67944421 over 6 years ago

Hi thanks for your help - adding surfaces is great. However, PLEASE, PLEASE be careful, you have moved a number of nodes (shops and cash machines) to other parts of the map and I'm having to revert those changes. A better map editor to avoid these mistakes is JOSM.
Cheers,
Alex

66647446 over 6 years ago

Hey Ageing Rocker,
You won't be able to correct the errors using Maps.Me, best option is to use the OpenStreetMap website and the Edit button. Saying that, I've corrected those places for you, so don't worry too much. Glad you're making the most of OSM and enjoying your travels!

66647446 over 6 years ago

Duplicating some places: osm.org/node/6237273788

65505542 over 6 years ago

Thanks, I fixed the couple of construction tags that were still on there. It'll show as open now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65505542

65247950 over 6 years ago

You're late - it's been demolished!

62086387 almost 7 years ago

Nice to see a fellow mapper in the area, enjoy Bexhill :)

62063994 almost 7 years ago

Nice to see a fellow mapper in the area, hope you enjoyed Bexhill :)

61234901 about 7 years ago

Should this tag have been changed to 'wikimedia_commons'?

49102483 about 7 years ago

Oops thanks for spotting that mistake. I'll fix it now.

57939650 over 7 years ago

Thanks Jan, that one slipped through the net. I appreciate your time to check. Done.

54933572 over 7 years ago

I made a mistake with the tagging on this. I'd accidentally set this building to a house when it was a garage. Fixed now, thanks!

53882597 over 7 years ago

Hey there, I think it may be better practice to use the 'width' key rather than the 'lanes' key for narrow lanes- osm.wiki/Key:lanes#Narrow_roads
Are you happy for me to change this?

53164508 almost 8 years ago

Hi Mike, yes it's been an invaluable asset to finding paths around my neighbourhood to survey. They also supply a wms overlay (https://data.gov.uk/dataset/rights-of-way-not-definitive-for-east-sussex) which works great with josm.
I'll remove those licensed/permissive designation tags on my next changeset - thanks for explaining and bringing this to my attention.
Alex

53164508 almost 8 years ago

Mike,
Indeed, wherever the paths run side-by-side I have put them as a single way.
I was assuming because this horse only section that breaks away from the foot and bicycle path is still a Public Right of Way (see https://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/leisureandtourism/countryside/rightsofway/map/map.aspx, gridref: TQ770107), it still needed some kind of designation tag?
Alex

53164508 almost 8 years ago

Hi Mike, yes foot and bike traffic is split with horses at this point with a sign similar to this (http://news.eastsussex.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/07/Greenways-2.jpg).
Although, I should have / now will set the bridleway to horse=designated.
Thanks,
Alex

52032658 almost 8 years ago

Do you need help with editing? This church does not exist.