OpenStreetMap ロゴ OpenStreetMap

Changeset 日時 コメント
168665133 25日前

Sorry I'm not sure where you're getting 9% from. The link you provide for `currency:XBT` shows 7.35% with a combination of `building=*`. This key is fairly small in terms of sample size though, only having around 17,000 uses.

Checking some more common POI keys though, I believe this is more common of a combination than you think:

`key` - combination % - ~combination total

`amenity` - 10.98% - ~3.34 Million
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity#combinations

This also includes parking, so remove ~70,000 for `amenity=parking` + `building=*`.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=parking#combinations

`shop` - 19.25% - ~1.28 Million
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#combinations

Sure these are still a minority in terms of percentages, but to me over 4 million objects mapped this way means its still a fairly common way to map it.

Like these from around the Greater Houston area:
osm.org/way/541169550
osm.org/way/261269148
osm.org/way/347136369
osm.org/way/526884518

168665133 26日前

I'm not sure Twitter is a proper source license-wise, but I've left the crypto tags you've added alone.

I wanted to ask why you removed the building? This restaurant is the only thing in the building so theres not a need for it to be a separate node. I've re-added the building and merged the node back in with changeset/168670890

168420651 約1ヶ月前

This changeset reverts changeset/168342525 and changeset/168396583

168396583 約1ヶ月前

This has been reverted by changeset/168420651

168342525 約1ヶ月前

This has been reverted by changeset/168420651

168396583 約1ヶ月前

I think something went wrong with this changeset, all of the nodes added here are at (0,0).

164099950 約1ヶ月前

I've changed the tagging of this from `natural=peak` to `natural=hill` in changeset/168314108.

Tbh, I don't think this should be tagged as a hill either, but its at least more accurate than a peak. An `ele=12` is barely a hill, but definitely not a mountain peak.

145708545 7ヶ月前

Appreciate you catching that, and thanks for fixing it!

145708545 7ヶ月前

Honestly I have no idea, about a year ago I went through the billiards tagging to clean it up to the standard that the Wiki had said.

I've never heard of Bar Billiards before so at the time I probably just assumed this was a tagging mistake for Bar tables (7ft) as they are generally called in pool leagues, I can change it back if you'd like.

154328976 7ヶ月前

Hi, the POI you added for Big Tyme Billiards is a duplicate of node/11037664808, so I have removed it.

158998912 8ヶ月前

Hey, just wanted to check whats up with these `house=terracedhttps://www.articulate.com/360/` tags, is this some kind of ad or just a copy/paste error?

For example: osm.org/way/1332811976

159937660 8ヶ月前

Hey this is awesome, thank you for taking care of a lot of these streams! I've been meaning to do something about these for awhile and am really happy to see these added.

153768348 約1年前

https://maproulette.org/challenge/43561/task/230326011

152623905 約1年前

Looks like a section of this bus route was deleted in this changeset.

osm.org/relation/3969349#map=17/29.76465/-95.37034

152502611 約1年前

Ah alright thanks for confirming, I haven't been down Kuykendahl here recently so I didn't realize they had cleared those trees.

If you ever need anything please let me know!

152502611 約1年前

Hi, thank you for your contribution, just wanted to check why you deleted the natural=wood and natural=scrub areas here when you added the park?

These area types are not mutually exclusive.

148531868 1年以上前

Apologies, the bounding box for this is a lot larger than the area of edit since I split the railway here to add a bridge:

osm.org/way/1261371104

147957251 1年以上前

Apologies for the changeset bounding box being large, looks like it was because of this crossing I added with the railway: osm.org/node/11668360335

146691660 1年以上前

This bounding box was a lot larger than expected, guess I accidentally moved a node on the river when going along there. Apologies for that.

143449868 ほぼ2年前

This is to resolve a note, should have waited to close it in iD so it would be in the changeset tags but I closed this before I made the edit and didn't want to reopen it just for that.

osm.org/note/3956232