Hi mapnerd, thanks for adding detail to OSM.
Please can you use more meaningful changeset comments when you publish your changest, as it helps other contributors who are reviewing your changes. See the OSM wiki page here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156556417

I have simplified the highways around the Pit Stop
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154799341

Hi mapnerd, similar issue in this changeset to what was brought up by ❤️‍🔥 for changeset 154877622. The service ways through the carpark at Moselle Rd/Waipareira Ave did not need to be split into separate ways for each direction. This should only be done when there is a clear physical distinction and distance between each direction, for example dual carriageways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154799341

Hi adssadsad, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. I have reviewed this changeset and it adds good detail to existing features. Please can you use more meaningful changeset comments summarising what changes were made. This helps the review process and helps to communicate your intentions. Thanks, keep it up
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154872779

Hi mapnerd, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. I have reviewed this changeset. Mostly it contains good edits which add nice detail to the map. It would be useful to have a more informative changeset comment describing what was changed. There are two issues I have noticed in this changeset. The first issue is that you accidentally dragged a node on the way 605391262. This has extended a service way several a long distance across the neighbourhood. I will fix this issue now. The second issue is with Way 59580371 - this was correctly tagged as an unnamed footway, but you have changed it to a service way (alley), and given it a name tag. It may be colloquially called an alleyway, but in this case the name should only really be for signposted names. It is not a service way/alley, I recommend reading the OSM wiki page for the feature for clarification on this point: osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley Other than those two issues, the changeset is all good, thanks and keep it up

Kia ora Sam thanks for fixing the addresses. You can inspect the history of the address nodes to see the source used is was LINZ (Land Information New Zealand). That is likely what is also used by Google Maps. I can see that the LINZ dataset is different to what is in the Auckland Council address dataset (AC is more similar to your correction). Unclear to me why they differ, because my understanding is that LINZ gets its address data from the councils.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154501273

Hi chatnz, this inconsistency is due to OSM contributors mapping in different styles. Both approaches are valid. Welcome to OSM, you'll be seeing a lot of similar inconsistencies :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154327976

❤️‍🔥 I can see this changeset was marked Resolved but the ways I have checked which were changed in this changest are still showing as highway=residential
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154249401

The changesets from HeyHiHello123 that I have reviewed in Auckland are making many such changes which are out of step with the standard mapping practice in Auckland, effectively promoting private driveways to public named residential roads. I would like to see those changes reverted entirely, but unfortunately there are other changes in the changesets which are completely fine.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154249401

Hi chatnz, in this changeset you have created a duplicate feature of the school. The school was already mapped at this location. Perhaps you were meaning to adjust the shape of the school? If so, I recommend deleting the duplicate feature, and adjusting the shape of the existing feature: osm.org/way/736726984/history#map=19/-36.92810/174.74621
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154254195

Hi chatnz, welcome to OSM thank you for your edits. You're correct that the default LINZ aerial imagery layer is quite old (circa 2017). Try switching the background imagery layer to 'Bing' to see more recent aerial imagery. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154164219

Hi Alex, thanks for making your reasoning clear in the changeset comment. However this is not a valid reason to create a duplicate feature. The issue of not being able to search for schools mapped as polygons is a problem with the data consumer (ie the map you mention), not an issue in the underlying OSM data. If you'd like assistance in tackling the problem you're seeing, the changeset comments aren't a great place for it so I would suggest posting a topic in the OSM Community page: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154123172

Hi Alex, the changes you have made in this changeset are using outdated aerial imagery (LINZ aerial imagery, which currently dates from 2017 in this area). Please use Bing aerial as more recent imagery to refer to. Can you please use more meaningful notes about what changes you have made, rather than "This is my local neighbourhood" - which does not tell us what changes were made. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154038678

Similarly, you added Marist School as a point (by adding detail to the address node). This is fine, except that the school is already mapped as an area: osm.org/way/24532021

So now the school is duplicated
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154036023

Hi Alex, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your updates to the map. Note that the Mount Albert Aquatic Centre was already mapped as a building at osm.org/way/60846989 . Because it already exists as a building, it is not necessary to add it as a node. This concept is called "one feature, one OSM element": osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154036023

Looks good. Welcome to OSM editing and thank you for your updates to the Tāmaki Link route relation.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153807678

Hi you dragged node 11726186943 with this edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153646719

Hi Sucl, This changeset made several updates to Wynyard Point referring to very old aerial imagery. There has been significant change in this area, I suggest using the Bing aerial imagery to see the more recent changes. Also your change to the centre span of the harbour bridge was not required, as the lane layout was already well-captured using the lanes tags. Accordingly, I have reverted this changeset in my CS# 152476295
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152407952

Hi Sucl,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.
Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments - this helps make it clear what your intentions were with each changeset, for other contributors who can review your edits. Currently you are only entering 'Updated' which doesn't tell us much.
Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152397253

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thank you for your update at Hastings Street/Liquidambar Drive. I have now also drawn in the new buildings, which are visible in the newer Bing aerial imagery.