OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135956056 over 2 years ago

Hi, Selwyn College is already mapped as an area: osm.org/way/27034179

So adding the school point is not required and becomes a duplicate feature. Can you please delete the point you added?

Thanks

135760664 over 2 years ago

No worries, that does explain it: the original POIs are quite new, only added 28 days ago. I'll do some clean up of the dupes. Cheers

135760664 over 2 years ago

Hi Omnific, thanks for adding more retail POIs in Waiheke Island. However I noticed that several of these are duplicates of existing features (eg Out There, Chances and True Blue)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135760664

135697181 over 2 years ago

Hi Sucl, the driveway should just be drawn as a single line, not as an area. It does not need a name tag
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135697181

135698674 over 2 years ago

Please do no put address numbers in the name tag. No name tag is needed on houses
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135698674

135694094 over 2 years ago

Rainbow's End is already mapped as osm.org/way/29418232/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135694094

135180855 over 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your edit adding the grass area. Only specifically named features need a 'name' tag (like the Old Government House Lawn). This area does not have a specific name, so it should not have a name tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135180855

134674580 over 2 years ago

Hey Kyle, I'm curious if you're using an imagery source for this changeset, or schematic plans, or have you surveyed the area? Specifically for the new section of shared path between Hudson Rd and Te Honohono ki tai - I can't see this in any imagery layers I use. Way: 1160808656

134514929 over 2 years ago

Thanks for adding the driveways, but please don't give them unnecessary names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134514929

134489299 over 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. This feature doesn't actually need a name of 'parking aisle', as it is already described by the other tags. You can delete the name key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134489299

133851212 over 2 years ago

This should be tagged leisure=swimming_pool. See this example at a neighbouring property: osm.org/way/614528341
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133851212

133806857 over 2 years ago

Hi HaoYue, welcome to OpenStreetMap editing. I wonder, was this part of a university assignment?

I have reviewed your changes. I can see that all of the features you have created already existed on the map. I have reverted your changes. Please take care not to duplicate features which already exist.

Thanks

133693603 over 2 years ago

Welcome to OSM editing. Unfortunately the quality of this changeset was not great - many accidental changes, and re-mapping of existing features. I have reverted it with changeset 133771437
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133693603

133509261 over 2 years ago

I don't think it really matters - but technically Glenvar Road damage was from the January 27 flooding

129980242 over 2 years ago

Thanks for taking the time, I appreciate it. I think in the case of Ponsonby (like many suburbs) it's impossible to pinpoint a single perceived centre - and I accept people are likely to differ on this - but I do think that the location over the community centre building at 20 Ponsonby Terrace provides a nice balance representing the centre of "Ponsonby the residential suburb to the west of Ponsonby Rd, north of Richmond Rd", and "Ponsonby the retail/commercial strip along Ponsonby Road". And it does help it's the location of the Ponsonby Community Centre building.

So yes I will move it back there now, but I will try stop considering geographical centres and cartographic labelling when working with place nodes - I appreciate the logic for using perceived centres as best practice.

Cheers

129980242 over 2 years ago

Hey StenSoft, this location for the Ponsonby place node feels awkward - it's too close to the boundary with Freemans Bay and St Marys (based on post codes/ FENZ localities/local knowledge). Do you mind if I move it back to its previous location south-west over the top of the community centre? That's also closer to the NZGB location for Ponsonby.
https://data.linz.govt.nz/x/GSauWr

133147363 over 2 years ago

Wiki suggests using place=locality when there's no feature to be tagged. I think in this case it makes sense to add this name to the landuse=retail around the shops. osm.org/way/116434887
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147363

133122030 over 2 years ago

Thanks for adding the name. You have adjusted the geometry to old imagery (see Bing for the recent aerial - it is a construction area)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133122030

132900659 over 2 years ago

The school was already mapped as osm.org/way/28791304
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132900659

132732720 over 2 years ago

Nice - I have made some further edits in this block, including fixing the residential area which was tagged as a building: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132781435