Hi Deishelon welcome to OpenStreetMap thanks for contributing. You've requested a review of this changeset so I have taken a look. It's a good effort but there are some issues: You updated the construction area (WAY: 912218908) to a building=residential. It should instead be landuse=residential, and it does not require a layer tag. You have drawn approximate outlines of the buildings, and added appropriate tags - nice. However, you will be able to trace them more accurately if you switch to the 'Bing' imagery - it is more recent you can see the buildings to trace them more closely. Try not to connect them to the roads. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132732720

Hasn't this apartment completed construction?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131561090

Te Araroa Trail is captured as a route relation, because it encompasses many different features. It should not be put in the name field of individual features.

See the relevant route relation here: osm.org/relation/9581607
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131264876

Thanks for your edit, looks good. I have two suggestions: 1: Switch to the Bing Imagery when editing in Auckland, because it is more recent (you will notice a new building for the Childcare centre). 2: instead of amenity=childcare, probably amenity=kindergarten is more suitable. You can read the OSMwiki entries for more detail on the differences.

Hi 99 welcome to OSM editing and thanks for your contributions! One tip when drawing buildings: to get nice square angles you can use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' which will snap the corners to 90 degrees. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767250

Have you tried clearing this up with Auckland Council? It will most likely be incorrect in their data, which is then the source for LINZ and other maps.

Hi Alwyn can you please direct to the discussion you mention, I can not find it. It is unclear from your changeset comment what you are achieving by undoing the detailed mapping of landuse areas along road corridors. Especially if you plan to continue these mass modifications this will need further discussion in a forum
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128750531

Il y a une erreur. ce n'est pas Agbonou
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129311195

Hi pitscheplatsch,
Yes this user has been importing buildings en-masse directly, outside of the documented RapiD import. See my comment on the changeset here: osm.org/changeset/113376212

Noticed today that pedestrian access has been closed again.. I guess this will be intermittently opened/closed, so will leave it mapped as it is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128332238

Hi Incongitionz, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions tracing new houses - looking good! Two tips: you can use the Q shortcut when you have a building selected, to snap it to nice 90-degree angles. And the 'name' tag should be reserved for specific names, it should not be used for descriptions of features. Cheers keep it up
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128027249

Hi Bikersteve, this changeset accidentally moved a tree from Mayoral Drive onto the RNZ building on Hobson Street. Node 7851479563
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127752554

Please don't add footpaths in parking lots, when there is in fact no dedicated footpath. The highway=service is already suitable for all purposes.

Including a Czech google translate of the first comment:

Dobrý den, letecké snímky LINZ jsou 7 let zastaralé. Smazali jste mnoho věcí, které byly vytvořeny od roku 2017 v posledních přibližně 100 sadách změn. Letecké snímky Bing jsou lepší, v městském Aucklandu jsou staré asi 9 měsíců.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126872418

Hi WinnieJane, welcome to OSM and thanks for your efforts to improve the pedestrian network. Adding the 'footpaths' alongside the service parking_aisles is unnecessary. There are no physical footpaths there, and the already existing service ways are suitable for pedestrian routing. Please do not map footpaths in parking lots like this.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126923471

Thanks for fixing, this was a result of fumbling a new keyboard shortcut. Not sure why JOSM didn't flag these when I went to upload the changes it normally catches things like this for me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126499711

Fixed with CS# 126416056

I don't know how all the nodes ended up with a source=esri tag. I will try fix this now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126411726

Hi Proseperosity, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. As you've discovered, editing coastlines can become quite complex especially when they're contained in Relations and at interfaces with rivers! I've had a go at tidying the rivermouth where you identified the coastline should end and the river begins. I used the JOSM editor which is a more powerful editor than the web iD editor, which is better suited for complex edits like this.

Hi D-AIHB, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. Nice to see construction date information added. Note that there is a dedicated tag for capturing the construction date of features, it is 'start_date', you can read about it here on the OSM Wiki: osm.wiki/Key:start_date