Invalid changeset comment. Should have been "Added memorial and adjacent tracks near southern route 1". Also, the source is both a survey and ja.is/kort material.

Also see note #4594672

Alright, I'll use the first scheme from osm.wiki/Tag:disc_golf%3Dhole then, i.e. `par` and `dist` without prefix.

Oh wow what a mistake of mine. And then JOSM auto-completed the typo again. Thanks for spotting.

P.S. Damn you're an incredibly active mapper. Thank you so much for your constant year-long contributions!

Hi mueschel. I am aware of that; I chose to use both tagging schemes in parallel because the wiki page said that there was no consensus about how this should be tagged. I opted to include both with the same data, so that potential consumers could use it regardless which of the two proposals they would use. Am I wrong on that one?

Interesting. Thanks for the insights. I've also found https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listi_yfir_%C3%BEj%C3%B3%C3%B0vegi_%C3%A1_%C3%8Dslandi that serves a reference/overview. I don't know how up-to-date that is, though.

See osm.org/changeset/154201429 for my fix. I re-arranged the bus stops and routing according to their order of appearance. This is mandatory to make bus routing work properly.

Hi AFL02, I fear there were some errors in the bus route 18. Maybe more are affected, but I have only verified it for 18 so far.
In particular, the last stop is not ordered correctly. The last stop should be Spöngin but is Lambhagavegur (Node 4354587264).
I will attempt fixing this.

Hi AFL02, I've seen `designation` oftentimes throughout Iceland. Could you give me a source for them and/or a description of their meanings? Because they do not use osm.wiki/Key:designation?uselang=en as it seems. Thank you very much.

See changeset 152097636.

Hi. I saw the signs for no horse/pedestrian/dog at roughly 64.32904/-22.03547 - which is the start of Akrafjallsvegur to the east. I couldn't read the sign below and forgot to translate them afterwards. You are right about this one, thank you for spotting it. I will revert my change.

Hello AGEN143,
what was your source to add the 360° view to the viewpoint? You said it was Bing Maps, but Bing Maps can not show you height differences. Thanks for your contributions.
Kind regards, Crsi

I see, thanks for the quick response. But I think there was never a railway track before, so the 'disused' key is not quite appropriate.
According to the wiki:
"A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place."

Did you just see the railway's tracks (the metal bars) lying around, then I would vote for removing this way entirely.

Hello notzfc,
are you sure there is a disused railway there? I'm pretty confident that there is no such railway. Could you please clarify your source?
Kind regards, Crsi

Thanks, I appreciate it :)

Hello AFL02, could you point me to your source regarding the new development plans? Thank you, Crsi

Oh, you already undid my deletion. Thank you.

Thanks for spotting. I didn't know that, I'm using Bing almost always. I will correct my change. :)

Hello Néhémie and welcome to OSM.

It looks like you have added some historic city walls. However, it looks like some of them are not still standing, i.e. are ruins, from satellite images. If that is the case, please don't use barrier=city_wall for them, which would imply an actual, existing impassable city wall. Use historic=citywalls instead.
There are parts of wall structures to the east which do look like they qualify to get this tag, though.

Thank you very much,
Crsi

Hello ladx, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions.

Various of your edited buildings have identical addresses. This is most likely not correct. For example, consider Austin Cres W 25. This address exists three times on three different buildings which are very close together. The actual house should get the address, while other buildings on that plot like sheds or garages, usually don't have an address.

Also, please bear in mind that the changeset comment is used to indicate what you've changed to other humans. The comments '123' are not very helpful for others to judge whether the change is meaningful and legitimate. Please try to use better comments in the future, thank you. :)