Cucazer's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
99652178 | over 4 years ago | These changes were made using StreetComplete app. It does not provide options for manual changeset splits. Instead, it opens a changeset for each quest (question) type and collects all answers there for some time period (surveying).
|
98138997 | over 4 years ago | Дороги, использующиеся для проезда на территории следует отмечать тэгом highway=service. highway=track используется для небольших сельскохозяйственных дорог/неофициальных грунтовок.
|
98139046 | over 4 years ago | Почему были удалены дороги, которые видны на аэрофотоснимках и на снимках с земли (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/W6aA9uXanAH8eBVjSgkggE, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ocCaqldH-D75CN6JNMj12A)?
|
94937581 | over 4 years ago | Vai runa iet par veloceļiņu relation tipa objektiem? |
94937581 | over 4 years ago | Kāpēc tiek dzēsti papildinājumi no manis un Aldis Smans - osm.org/#map=19/55.89631/26.60834, osm.org/#map=19/55.86962/26.51262 (ceļiņi parka ieejā, parka ceļiņa tracing), osm.org/#map=19/55.86727/26.51391 (dzēstas kāpnes, ceļiņu tracing)?
|
93930175 | over 4 years ago | Salabots ar osm.org/changeset/95070919 |
91549465 | almost 5 years ago | Uhm, this is rendering not as I've planned. Maybe splitting the forest is the better option... |
91252544 | almost 5 years ago | Changed from steles to war memorials, as it is their primary task. Can be changed back to steles or be used as multivalue.
|
90311470 | almost 5 years ago | Please see osm.org/changeset/90128911 and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Nbhc3DVk8GQrZfC2t7CaTu
|
89556194 | almost 5 years ago | Это неверное смещение парковки, старое было правильным. Причина в том, что спутниковые снимки Bing имеют небольшой сдвиг и изначально координаты точки карты OSM и её отображение на этих спутниковых картах не совпадают.
|
89105454 | almost 5 years ago | Добро пожаловать на OpenStreetMap, некоммерческий проект по созданию открытой карты мира!
|
89135597 | almost 5 years ago | This shifting of bridge is somewhat incorrect, as it relies on satellite imagery and not real gps data. You can verify it by enabling Mapillary imagery in Map data panel - your tracks appear now as partially "hanging" above water. You can see that this bridge is straight, whereas you've introduced some kind of turn here. The problem here is that Maxar imagery isn't always correctly offsetted, you can even see some tiling artifact at the north end of the bridge - the parts of road are not correctly connected. Esri imagery with default offset is much better in this case. You can see that your Mapillary images align pretty good with these satellite images and error is not more than 1m, can be explained with GPS inaccuracy
|
89167382 | almost 5 years ago | The building itself isn't named Latvijas Ģeotelpiskās informācijas aģentūra (LĢIA), it's LĢIA, which resides in this building -> 2 features are required - area for house and point for LĢIA with the same address
|
89137689 | almost 5 years ago | For tagging rows of garages building=garages should be used. building=garage is used to tag single-user garage
|
88928411 | almost 5 years ago | The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
|
88928650 | almost 5 years ago | The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
|
88996635 | almost 5 years ago | There is no need to tag simple polygon of a single building as multipoligon with several connected lines
|
88247654 | about 5 years ago | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like together with intended edits you've removed some valuable tags, especially building=yes tag. That's why the institute isn't shown as building anymore.
|
86675574 | about 5 years ago | Was Cita santehnika really closed down?
|
86257630 | about 5 years ago | Do these new footpaths near the main road also wobble from side to side in the reality or go more or less straight?
|