OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
99652178 over 4 years ago

These changes were made using StreetComplete app. It does not provide options for manual changeset splits. Instead, it opens a changeset for each quest (question) type and collects all answers there for some time period (surveying).
So in this case better advice could be not to complete quests from different parts of the world in one session. Only after some time (several hours?) the changeset is closed and uploaded. Answering questions somewhere else would then create a new changeset without greatly expanding bounding box of the previous one.

98138997 over 4 years ago

Дороги, использующиеся для проезда на территории следует отмечать тэгом highway=service. highway=track используется для небольших сельскохозяйственных дорог/неофициальных грунтовок.
Аналогичный вопрос по поводу удалённой дороги, как и в другой правке.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98138997

98139046 over 4 years ago

Почему были удалены дороги, которые видны на аэрофотоснимках и на снимках с земли (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/W6aA9uXanAH8eBVjSgkggE, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ocCaqldH-D75CN6JNMj12A)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98139046

94937581 over 4 years ago

Vai runa iet par veloceļiņu relation tipa objektiem?

94937581 over 4 years ago

Kāpēc tiek dzēsti papildinājumi no manis un Aldis Smans - osm.org/#map=19/55.89631/26.60834, osm.org/#map=19/55.86962/26.51262 (ceļiņi parka ieejā, parka ceļiņa tracing), osm.org/#map=19/55.86727/26.51391 (dzēstas kāpnes, ceļiņu tracing)?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94937581

93930175 over 4 years ago

Salabots ar osm.org/changeset/95070919

91549465 almost 5 years ago

Uhm, this is rendering not as I've planned. Maybe splitting the forest is the better option...

91252544 almost 5 years ago

Changed from steles to war memorials, as it is their primary task. Can be changed back to steles or be used as multivalue.
The inscriptions for bigger steles, unfortunately, exceed the limit of 255 characters, so I left the URL with all texts. Can be transformed to Wikidata objects with inscription key.

90311470 almost 5 years ago

Please see osm.org/changeset/90128911 and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Nbhc3DVk8GQrZfC2t7CaTu
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90311470

89556194 almost 5 years ago

Это неверное смещение парковки, старое было правильным. Причина в том, что спутниковые снимки Bing имеют небольшой сдвиг и изначально координаты точки карты OSM и её отображение на этих спутниковых картах не совпадают.
В этом плане лучше спутниковые снимки Esri - поставьте их и убедитесь, что ваши правки по сдвигам были откачены как раз к этим снимкам.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89556194

89105454 almost 5 years ago

Добро пожаловать на OpenStreetMap, некоммерческий проект по созданию открытой карты мира!
Пожалуйста, не вносите изменения, основываясь на данных Google, в особенности Google Maps. Политика использования данных Google противоречит принципам открытых карт OSM. В этом смысле самый достоверный источник - это Ваши наблюдения непосредственно на месте.

89135597 almost 5 years ago

This shifting of bridge is somewhat incorrect, as it relies on satellite imagery and not real gps data. You can verify it by enabling Mapillary imagery in Map data panel - your tracks appear now as partially "hanging" above water. You can see that this bridge is straight, whereas you've introduced some kind of turn here. The problem here is that Maxar imagery isn't always correctly offsetted, you can even see some tiling artifact at the north end of the bridge - the parts of road are not correctly connected. Esri imagery with default offset is much better in this case. You can see that your Mapillary images align pretty good with these satellite images and error is not more than 1m, can be explained with GPS inaccuracy
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89135597

89167382 almost 5 years ago

The building itself isn't named Latvijas Ģeotelpiskās informācijas aģentūra (LĢIA), it's LĢIA, which resides in this building -> 2 features are required - area for house and point for LĢIA with the same address
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89167382

89137689 almost 5 years ago

For tagging rows of garages building=garages should be used. building=garage is used to tag single-user garage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89137689

88928411 almost 5 years ago

The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88928411

88928650 almost 5 years ago

The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88928650

88996635 almost 5 years ago

There is no need to tag simple polygon of a single building as multipoligon with several connected lines
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88996635

88247654 about 5 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like together with intended edits you've removed some valuable tags, especially building=yes tag. That's why the institute isn't shown as building anymore.
Other questions could be: does this building have no defibrillator access anymore? Cannot this building be called ZM 1 anymore?
Moreover, the address of the SICP node needs to be updated if it has moved into other building.

86675574 about 5 years ago

Was Cita santehnika really closed down?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86675574

86257630 about 5 years ago

Do these new footpaths near the main road also wobble from side to side in the reality or go more or less straight?
In general - a lot of unnecessary points used, 2 points are enough to show a straight part of the road. Of course more can be used to show smoothness of a turn or to trace a narrow bendy footway in a forest. Please consider straightening paths and connecting ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86257630