Comentariile Cucazer

Set de modificări	Când	Comentariu
168993034	cu 17 zile în urmă	Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately, Google Street View is not allowed as a data source here, see osm.wiki/Google. You are welcome to use the alternative street-level imagery sources like Mapillary (or KartaView, Mapilio etc., see Map Data toolbar in iD editor). These services allow to upload own recordings that can later be safely used for OSM mapping. In addition, local knowledge of the current situation and, especially, checking the situation on-site remain as reliable sources of information. Happy mapping, Cucazer
158829321	cu 9 luni în urmă	Čau! Vai osm.org/way/1331445061, osm.org/way/1331445062 un pārējie nav būtu landuse=grass un tad viens kopīgs leisure=park apkārt (ja to vispār var skaitīt par parku)? Citādi kaut kā neloģiski sanāk, ka vienā vietā ir 6 dažādi mazi parciņi... Savukārt osm.org/way/129399051 tika pārtegots uz highway=residential, tikmēr visi pārējie ceļi apkārt ir highway=living_street. Nedomāju, ka dzīvojama zona tiek pārktraukta uz šo mazo gabaliņu. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158829321
154413470	aproximativ un an în urmă	Hi, there's still osm.org/node/7815115383 - double tagging?
154124072	aproximativ un an în urmă	Found the reference: https://osgeo-oceania.org/2023/07/18/qgis-training/ Also see osm.org/way/1302388583 and surroundings
153751609	aproximativ un an în urmă	Thanks! So you mean that some of the cutlines are not usable as track/path? I guess, it's not confidently identifiable just from the aerial imagery.
153476252	aproximativ un an în urmă	Hello, what was the intention for restoring leisure=swimming_pool tags, while having the same with abandoned:? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153476252
153397008	aproximativ un an în urmă	Hello, I'm not sure about the northern edge. Digital terrain imagery suggests that there is some water level 20-50 meters further out. Or is it now just a muddy reedbed with no constant water level? I'm not much familiar with this side of the lake though... Nevertheless it's an improvement from the previous version! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153397008
151829076	aproximativ un an în urmă	Additional source: https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/daugavgrivas-cietums
151463624	aproximativ un an în urmă	Hello! This changeset created a bunch of multipolygons (e.g. osm.org/relation/17605455, osm.org/relation/17605456) for the objects that were already marked as simple polygons. These didn't have any unusual geometries (as in osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Examples_in_XML) to justify use of multipolygons. In this scenario converting simple ways to relations with many members just complicates further editing, as the features cannot be that easily separated. What are your intentions with converting simple polygons to multipolygons?
149995172	mai mult de un an în urmă	The new track osm.org/way/1272534387 got connected to landuse contours. This does not make much sense and better to leave the end unconnected or terminate it with a gate or turning circle.
146282395	mai mult de un an în urmă	Ooh, I've always stumbled upon these points and wondered whether these really belong here. Thanks for addressing my concerns! Btw, that knotted area in the middle is some kind of MTB park with trails and jumps, as I remember it from more than 10 years ago. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146282395
146047262	mai mult de un an în urmă	Yes, this changeset is related to that note, thank you for linking
144762095	mai mult de un an în urmă	Ah, damn, dachte, man kann die ruhig löschen, wenn schon auf irgendwelchem Luftbild die nicht mehr sichtbar sind. Auf NRW Ortophoto sind die einfach weg, auf iDOP habe ich den neuen Umriss gefunden. Und bei Liegenschaftskataster ist das neue Gebäude schon da, aber noch als "geplant". Man kann das Changeset dann ruhig reverten - habe (halbabsichtlich) nicht viel außerdem gemacht, ist schnell wiederholbar. Danke fürs Reviewen!
137249903	aproximativ 2 ani în urmă	Weitere Details wie Gebäude, Wege, Pfade und andere Details müssen noch surveyed werden...
133438389	mai mult de 2 ani în urmă	Hallo! Nach diesem Changeset hat das Gebäude osm.org/way/47930651 nur die Stadt und PLZ als Adresse. Ist es absichtlich so? Gruß, Cucazer
133363502	mai mult de 2 ani în urmă	Hallo, habe maxspeed nicht angefasst und nicht überprüft, aber ja, ist tatsächlich ein highway=living_street - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3924308510990608 Aber driveways bleiben driveways?
129715634	mai mult de 2 ani în urmă	Хоть это и не запрещено, я бы не рекомендовал рисовать дорожки одной линией, как в случае с osm.org/way/1119447706. Это логически не одна дорожка, а 2 тротуара и 2 перехода, поэтому впоследствии их всё равно придётся разделить (шорткат X в iD), хотя бы для проставления footway=crossing для переходов. К тому же это предотвращает проставление тэгов, которые относятся только к одной части этой дорожки, по невнимательности или в StreetComplete. В остальном, прорисовка и улучшение контуров зданий - хорошее дело.
129041975	mai mult de 2 ani în urmă	Hallo, mit welcher Absicht wurde die Straße zusätzlich als Gebäude markiert? (https://maproulette.org/challenge/27775/task/141656705)
76686141	mai mult de 2 ani în urmă	Hallo! Leider hat der Tag public_transport in OpenStreetMap (siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:public_transport) etwas andere Bedeutung als Durchfaht zu verbieten. Dafür habe ich in osm.org/changeset/128599444 auf bus=no (siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:access#Verkehrsmittel) als Fahrverbot für die Büsse umgetauscht. Wenn aus irgendwelchen Grund das auch für andere öffentliche Verkehrsmittel (z.B. Taxis) gilt, kann es mit psv=no verallgemeinet werden. Gruß, Cucazer
125639210	aproape 3 ani în urmă	Raiņa iela? It is nowhere near this place! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125639210