Can you elaborate on what you did, rather than requesting someone to review your edit?

I mean like squared angles or 90 degrees. :D

Definitely not just squares! The outlines are pretty good other than that! :D

Segment referenced in the second comment:
osm.org/way/304325177

It seems very unreliable to be adding segments that don't have ground truth across a freeway.

Additionally, can you elaborate on why you readded a "razed" railroad that has been mostly overbuilt by a freeway, I-190? There is definitely no crossing across the freeway. None of the aerial imagery nor street-level imagery have any railway, razed or otherwise going across the freeway.

Since there is no trace of this on the ground since the western segment has been overbuilt and long replaced by a major roadway with NO crossings across the freeway, it really shouldn't be mapped in accordance with OSM guidelines of only mapping what is on the ground and can be verified:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Can you elaborate on why you readded:
osm.org/way/97788410

Is there really evidence of a railway going through multiple buildings and down the middle of multiple roads? There is evidence of rails on any aerial imagery that would be considered "razed" and there is no obvious RoW. It has been completely overbuilt by new buildings, railways, and roadways.

None of the buildings are square. "Q" can be used to square them.

You can square buildings using "Q". None of the buildings added in this changeset are square.

Also removed some features that no longer exist with no trace remaining that have long been overbuilt been new features, buildings and ponds.

It would be. Good catch. I'll take care of it.

A number of these railways were converted to abandoned railways, and I don't think that is correct...

osm.org/changeset/135162196

....And they were never removed...

Do not change valid roadways to cartpaths. This is not correct and has been reverted in part or full.

What source did you use? It looks like it could be unnamed.

What source did you use to add the name of these business/residential areas?

"Q" can be used to square buildings.

Has construction started on the Howard Gap Road to reopen it?

I agree with the note you added to the railways:

"per OSM guidance, abandoned railways should only be mapped where there is visible evidence of its former route. Consider deleting at least parts of this feature."

Tired of trying to map around them when adding buildings, roadways and other features that I usually just skip over areas with these railway headaches. Would be wise to remove at least the segments that are definitely gone.

Please do not map for online games. Only map features that exist, and not add non-existent features purely for a game. This is not allowed.

Do not use descriptions to describe a feature in the name field. For example, when you add a driveway, don't name it "driveway".

This golf course was removed from the map by:
osm.org/changeset/115575445

Do not add golf courses that do not exist. If you want to preserve the history, I suggest using OpenHistoricalMap (OHM)

reverted in:
osm.org/changeset/135214003