The fire station should still have its amenity=fire_station tag.

Building=* is not the same as amenity=*

Reviewed. Good edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169016218

I thought it was acceptable so long as they don't partially overlap. Overlapping is what screams OSMOSE/KeepRight issue flags.

You're correct, no errors on iD, but I will try take your feedback into account on the next golf course cleanup that screams for attention. Wasn't aware that it was incorrect. Would be a lot easier if the people originally mapping the golf courses would spend the time and care to do it correctly the first time, but I digress.

It happens. It's all endless links. If you see something like that where a coastline is tagged as node and is blatantly wrong - don't hesitate to correct.

Apologies I didn't respond earlier.

It looks like it was already reverted/fixed.
osm.org/node/12953207946/history

It was not intentional - I thought it was a node for the islet that was duplicated from the area.

Instead of adding a new node, please just update the node that already exists. changeset reverted.

If you resolved the note, shouldn't it be marked as resolved too?

Is this secondary highway *still* under construction?

Is the entire road closed with no access to cars, pedestrian, etc? It is tagged as completely closed with a default access=no. Is that correct?

Benches should not be named "Bench".

A name is only a name, and not a description. Names removed

It was blurry indeed. Another user left a note here saying it is Lane, so lets go with that. Thanks.

"Papa Lane" not "Papa Road"?

Hello, and welcome to OSM. I reviewed your changeset. I added access=private since it is a private driveway. Other than that, good edits!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165908195

CS popped up in OSMCHA. Good edit. Keep up the awesome work!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166044736

Edit reviewed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166969555

I would recommend keeping the address at least.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166282839

Good catch
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166484276

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote if it is private. You can read why deletion is not the answer here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/166952052

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote if it is private.

osm.org/changeset/166952003

The sidewalk on the bridge was correctly mapped. Why did you delete it? What does "PIDA" stand for?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166882938