Do not partially overlap landcovers.

When mapping woods/forests with many trees, areas should be used in lieu of a bunch of random tree nodes.

Again, please do not "lollipop". I have correct it for you in this changeset as well

Please don't "lollipop" the landcover

don't forget to include the parts as a bridge over the water!

In lieu of mapping every tree in a forest as individual nodes, you should use an natural=woods. You can read more about this tag here:

osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood

When mapping cartpaths, you should include the sections that go over the water as a bridge as well. Might as well include all the data and paths!

"Q" should be used to square the buildings.

Do not "lollipop" landcovers by folding an area back upon itself. If a hole is needed, a multipolygon relation should be used.

Nice of you to move it, but please, please, close out the anonymous notes you created when you resolve whatever the note is about

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570972

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570972

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570972

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570972

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570933

Please do not delete features that are clearly observable on aerial imagery. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

I also advise against using profane language. It goes against website policies.

osm.org/changeset/148570933

Added comment to original changeset. This was not a revert in the normal sense, but more of a cleanup.

osm.org/changeset/148526991
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148531976

This changeset was reverted in part or full. This is not the appropriate way to map private access. access=* tags should be used.

you also added a ton of water lock gates which are used in canals. I went ahead and changed it for you in verifiable locations with the correct gate tags.

Adding notes and names to ways/features does not align with OSM guidelines.

osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148526991

Please do not delete and then readd features. Just manipulate what is on the map to reflect what it should be.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148445913

When mapping landcovers, do not partially overlap the areas.