this is not how you add trees.

Changeset reverted

changeset reverted in part or full

changeset reverted

Descriptive names should not be used

Changeset reverted in part or full

Do not wrap areas back upon themselves to simulate a hole.

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

This is not how you add trees...

Also, this is NOT how you add trees... I have a feeling this is an alternate account as a result of your other account being blocked.

Do not partially overlap areas.

Please review the following webpage to avoid your edits being reverted:
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

Do not partially overlap areas.

Please review the following webpage to avoid your edits being reverted:
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Item is movable and after further discussion, I am wrong. Portable features should not be mapped since they can move, however, just because it is "private" doesn't really mean it shouldn't be mapped.

osm.org/changeset/149839258

I do request that better changeset comments be used to explain why they are being deleted, and not just "private."

I was thinking of it as no different from a pool, which we would map.

But thinking about the portability side, I do concur it shouldn't be mapped. I disagree on the "private" argument, but the portability, I 100% agree.

I am going to revert my revert.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

osm.org/changeset/149822738

Good building outlines.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149797445