OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 159441884 | 9 months ago | Reviewed as requested. Welcome to OSM. The changeset is amazing. Keep up the good work if you will stick around, and if you own the shop, best of luck on your new venture! :D
|
| 159442907 | 9 months ago | We try to map where a feature actually is. Not the middle of a farm field for SEO. Where is the place physically located? Where should a customer go to get guidance?
|
| 159400505 | 9 months ago | On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here: |
| 159408723 | 9 months ago | Reviewed as a periodic review. Good edit. Keep up the great contributions.
|
| 159407953 | 9 months ago | Reviewed as a periodic review. Good edit. Keep up the great contributions.
|
| 159436482 | 9 months ago | osm.org/user_blocks/16882
|
| 159436493 | 9 months ago | osm.org/user_blocks/16882
|
| 159436516 | 9 months ago | osm.org/user_blocks/16882
|
| 159427926 | 9 months ago | Looks like an account was created to evade a user block. New account:
|
| 147966350 | 9 months ago | Hello. I noticed that it also removed the gnis:ftype=* Fort example:
It looks like it should be a pipeline, but now that the data is removed, there really isn't much detail on what the shape/way/line is. |
| 159390999 | 9 months ago | I never called your edits vandalism. I only said only things that actually exist should be mapped (in accordance with OSM guidelines). Things that no longer exist (regardless of what it is) should not be mapped. Old buildings, roads, powerlines, railways, woods, etc. It doesn't matter if you squint your eyes and say "I see something that may have been a feature". If it no longer exists, it shouldn't be mapped. Features that jo loner exist should be mapped on OHM. What you were doing was mass reverts to remove every edit I did to remove new features, fixes and business and readd things that clearly no longer exist. |
| 159291652 | 9 months ago | Good edit. Keep up the good work!
|
| 159293497 | 9 months ago | Welcome to OSM. Changeset reviewed. Looks good.
|
| 159293802 | 9 months ago | Hello. And welcome to OSM. I reviewed your edit and found it to be good. Keep up the good work and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions.
|
| 159351330 | 9 months ago | On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here: |
| 159351330 | 9 months ago | On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here: |
| 159351398 | 9 months ago | On OSM, we map what is on the ground, even what can only been seen from above using aerial imagery. To denote that something is private, we use something called access tags. You canr ead more on why deletion is not the answer here: |
| 145855026 | 9 months ago | That's not something we map... |
| 159390999 | 9 months ago | I have no clue what you are trying to say.... I understand what the term means. In this context it is referring to the fact that personal info was mapped and should have never been mapped. An informal trail through the woods shouldn't be mapped in that manner. |
| 159324491 | 9 months ago | Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote private property.
|