Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field. Changeset looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131886684

Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field. Changeset looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131886684

I concur. I have been working to remove "abandoned" and "disused" railways that have long since been removed and built over. The wiki says something along the lines of "abandoned" railways are those with rails, signals or railbeds present. In this case, what you removed has no trace.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131889638

Edit looks good! (adjusted hours to be in the correct format). Thanks for learning how to edit OSM and adding it yourself. :D
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131896163

Please use more descriptive changeset comments.

Is there a reason you are not connecting the ways with bridges when there are bridges on the map?

Please be more careful when editing the map. The golf paths created had duplicates, used the incorrect tags and were left as a rats nest in several areas.

I have cleaned up this edit and will be reviewing the other edits to ensure that the poor quality here is addressed elsewhere.

Yes, actually, good point. The current imagery does not have paths there. It appears that the paths are aligned to older imagery.

The latest imagery does not have paths here. Bing provides the latest imagery here.

Rather than try to sort out correct alignment, it is easier to delete and remap.

Lol. At least there are no errors!

Has construction started?

Specifically, this one still doesn't look like construction has started.
osm.org/way/613595088

Why did you delete this road?

These unmarked crossings should be added back and this changeset should be reverted. Just because it is dangerous doesn't mean you can't cross or that there is no unmarked crosswalk there.

But these crossings are needed for routing. There are areas where there are implied crossings, such as driveways that sorta need to be mapped regardless.

Please be more descriptive in your changeset comments. For example - what did you change and why?

"mq" doesn't tell me anything, so I have to dig and research, whereas, "Added Speed Limit(s)" is immensely helpful.

Thanks, and welcome to OSM!

The iD editor already has a ton of aerial imagery available that are all acceptable sources, plus you can edit right on top of them.

Also updated road intersection after rails were removed.

It should probably be access=private, not access=no.

Why did you delete the trails?

The trails, even if not open to the public, or private property should not be removed. The access tag should instead be changed to access=private

Having a trail mapped, even if private or restricted, is valuable for search and rescue, as well as firefighting teams.

It's already mapped here, so you created a duplicate. I went ahead and merged the features.