Reverted in:
osm.org/changeset/133076201

This edit is being reverted. Do not change correctly mapped residential roads into cartpaths. This makes no sense, but feel free to elaborate on why this was done.

Why did you change these residential roads into cartpaths? They are very clearly roads and not cartpaths.

Please elaborate on why these roads were temporarily changed from cartpaths and back into residential roads?

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change/edit, and why?

Refer here for more info:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133025248

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133028447

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133030107

Do not add bridges as "buildings"... There is actually a tag for bridge, use that instead.

Do not use names to describe what an object is, such as in:

osm.org/way/1149541525

Do not change roadways into cartpaths just for your game. This is not acceptable on OSM.

osm.org/way/1149698999

Please do not use symbols or abbreviations such as "@".

Names should not be applied when they are descriptive in nature. For example, the names should not be "Hole #", this isn't needed.

Good catch, I must have mis-clicked while trying to select all the cartpaths.

You requested a review.

Looks ok. I fixed the tags and now it should show up a bit more obvious on the map. Best of luck in your new business!

You requested a review.

Looks good.

I'm not seeing any trace of a railway here from the latest satellite imagery.

Can you elaborate on the source?

As an FYI, "abandoned" should only be used if there is some trace left, whether that be rails, signals, overhead wires, or railroad ties. In this case, I see none of that. If nothing exists now, but did at one time and it is being mapped for historical reasons, it doesn't belong on OSM. But luckily, there is a website called OpenHistoricalMap, which is a form of OSM and allows all sorts of historic features to be added. Lifecycle changes can even be mapped from when it was planned to built to active and then disused to abandoned and removed.

Please do not add paths on top of paths. This causes issues with the map.

The vandalism has since been reverted and fixed.

What type of confusion? I am very familiar with this area.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why? Putting "1" does not tell me anything about what you did.

Do not add individual trees when a landuse would be more applicable.

Changeset reverted.