CurlingMan13's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
130770449 | over 2 years ago | What did you change, and why? Please try to elaborate more in your changeset comments. |
130839532 | over 2 years ago | Please use better changeset comments. What did you change, and why? |
133152870 | over 2 years ago | Reverted changeset in:
If it exists, it should still be mapped, albeit, with the correct tags.
|
133155087 | over 2 years ago | Please use better/more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why? Read here for more info:
|
133154675 | over 2 years ago | Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why? |
119679205 | over 2 years ago | Do not make temporary edits just for your silly golf game. This is vandalism and will be treated as such. |
97019068 | over 2 years ago | Do not add non-existent features to the map purely for a silly golf game. All of your edits have been reverted, as your actions are not in line with OSM guidelines. |
132370502 | over 2 years ago | Google Earth/Maps is not an acceptable source for OSM due to licensing. |
133150841 | over 2 years ago | "q" can be used to square the buildings. |
132770192 | over 2 years ago | Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
|
132770289 | over 2 years ago | Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
|
108552404 | over 2 years ago | This changeset should be reverted due to it being a low quality "import". The buildings are not square and do not align with the buildings themselves on aerial imagery (rotated) and/or do not match the shape of the house. It is clear that this import was not manually reviewed as stated in the note, and likely was not discussed beforehand. |
133136085 | over 2 years ago | Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? |
133120975 | over 2 years ago | Same thing here... Multipolygon Relation should be used instead. |
133138357 | over 2 years ago | Same thing as the other comment I left you. Please use a multipolygon relation to add "holes" to an area. The manner in which you did it is not correct. Refer here for more info, and reach out if you have questions:
|
133137471 | over 2 years ago | Do not do "holes" in an area in the manner in which you have. This is not correct. A relation should be used instead to punch out (or exclude) an inner area of a feature. This area and others have been updated accordingly to follow OSM best practices. |
133123390 | over 2 years ago | There is a vineyard tag. Do not use the name to add descriptive information. Just use the right tags... |
133147254 | over 2 years ago | Well, you clearly did a lot. What did you change and why? Here's a good guide you should look over:
|
132370502 | over 2 years ago | What source did you use? |
130664287 | over 2 years ago | You can use "q" to square the buildings. |