OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
130770449 over 2 years ago

What did you change, and why? Please try to elaborate more in your changeset comments.

130839532 over 2 years ago

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

133152870 over 2 years ago

Reverted changeset in:
osm.org/changeset/133158277

If it exists, it should still be mapped, albeit, with the correct tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133152870

133155087 over 2 years ago

Please use better/more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why?

Read here for more info:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

133154675 over 2 years ago

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why?

119679205 over 2 years ago

Do not make temporary edits just for your silly golf game. This is vandalism and will be treated as such.

97019068 over 2 years ago

Do not add non-existent features to the map purely for a silly golf game. All of your edits have been reverted, as your actions are not in line with OSM guidelines.

132370502 over 2 years ago

Google Earth/Maps is not an acceptable source for OSM due to licensing.

133150841 over 2 years ago

"q" can be used to square the buildings.

132770192 over 2 years ago

Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770192

132770289 over 2 years ago

Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770289

108552404 over 2 years ago

This changeset should be reverted due to it being a low quality "import". The buildings are not square and do not align with the buildings themselves on aerial imagery (rotated) and/or do not match the shape of the house. It is clear that this import was not manually reviewed as stated in the note, and likely was not discussed beforehand.

133136085 over 2 years ago

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

133120975 over 2 years ago

Same thing here... Multipolygon Relation should be used instead.

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

133138357 over 2 years ago

Same thing as the other comment I left you. Please use a multipolygon relation to add "holes" to an area. The manner in which you did it is not correct.

Refer here for more info, and reach out if you have questions:
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

133137471 over 2 years ago

Do not do "holes" in an area in the manner in which you have. This is not correct. A relation should be used instead to punch out (or exclude) an inner area of a feature.

This area and others have been updated accordingly to follow OSM best practices.

133123390 over 2 years ago

There is a vineyard tag. Do not use the name to add descriptive information. Just use the right tags...

133147254 over 2 years ago

Well, you clearly did a lot. What did you change and why?

Here's a good guide you should look over:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147254

132370502 over 2 years ago

What source did you use?

130664287 over 2 years ago

You can use "q" to square the buildings.