As I have mentioned before, please use more detailed changeset comments. Instead of "Yes", can you put what you changed and why?

More details on good changeset comments can be found here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Sounds like the on/off ramps might be open?

https://www.news.iowadot.gov/newsandinfo/2023/03/bridge-replacement-on-polk-county-road-f-22ne-126th-avenue-over-i-35-begins-wednesday-march-29.html#:~:text=Drivers%20may%20find%20that%20the%20north%2D%20and%20southbound%20I%2D35%20ramps%20at%20Exit%2096%20may%20be%20open%20at%20times%20depending%20on%20the%20work%20taking%20place.

The changeset was reverted since these paths/trails are visible from aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead rather than just deleting them.

Please do not delete trails/paths just because they are on private property.

For more on why these should be mapped, read here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t

osm.org/changeset/137967523

What exactly are you testing?

Please do not "lollipop" areas. Specifically, you are adding in little areas to punch a hole, rather than using a multirelation if you must. I've gone through and corrected it here and on other golf courses.

Is that road still under construction on I-75?

Can you elaborate on your changeset comment? What did you do, why, etc.?

I would be more than happy to take a look.

Access tags should be used rather than mass-deleting features which clearly exist.

You can read more here on why they should be mapped:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/137710101

Reverted changeset. Do not delete large chunks of a lake and incorrectly make it a water hazard for golf.

osm.org/changeset/137709817

Same thing with this one.

Do not add in fake features for your golf game. Example:
osm.org/way/917249653/history

This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

Do not add in fake features for your golf game. Example:
osm.org/way/917249653/history

This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

When adding cartpaths, please use the cartpath tags instead of land access.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480195

Please do not change roadways to have a tunnel when this is not the case.

osm.org/way/1183689606/history

"Fake" water hazards were removed. Please do not add fake and duplicate water areas for your golf game. This goes against OSM guidelines.

I think this should be reverted. I doubt it was actually discussed given that the user only has 3 edits.

There has been no attempt at resolving this changeset or addressing any of the issues identified. The many node lack a tag type and the name is abbreviated and all-caps.

I don't know the way to best fix the issues and given the low quality, I am not sure there is much benefit without any fix or cleanup.

Please do not use golf cartpaths to mark out parking lots.

Changing parking lot roads to cartpaths just for a silly game is not permitted. This edit has been reverted in part or full.

if you are going to add buildings for HotOSM, please, at least somewhat outline a building and don't lump 5 buildings together as some really irregular shape.

Hi ybungalobill,

Understood. It's just however StreetComplete did it. I wish I could just tag it as a turning lane. Feel free to update this way accordingly, and pass it along to the SC developers since you understand it bwtter than I do. I imagine there are many similar edits by many other users.

Is there a reason you didn't also add in the cartpath bridges where it goes over the water?