1) Please use changeset comments and include what you changed and why.

2) This is not a bridge. The other way should have been a tunnel. Fixed.
osm.org/way/879104396

You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles.

You should square the buildings using "q" to make them square with right angles. This changeset requires some cleanup to address this. Other features should be checked as well.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138442809

They wasted no time to change it back...

osm.org/changeset/138241722

Looks like they just ignored you and did it again everywhere.

I mean, regardless of whether it is closed or not, the fact that there are vendors here pretty much confirms it is a pedestrian area.

Can you elaborate on why this isn't a pedestrian area?

osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

The user got rid of the pedestrian tags again...

osm.org/changeset/138241957

They did here among a few others. Might be worth shooting a message off to DWG.

Looks good. FYI - you can also add private driveways at the end, being sure to use the tag "access=private"

This would highlight the fact of where the road ends.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138400959

FYI, if you don't feel like adding in a building (obvious if they don't resemble what is on the imagery), then you can just place nodes/points instead.

Are these the actual names of the trees or are they just the type of tree?

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/138401033

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Do not re-delete features. This has already been discussed in your previous changesets, such as:
osm.org/changeset/137812590

osm.org/changeset/138401025

Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/138400557

What's the deal with not adding bridge cartpaths over the water?

actually - added details and closed a note.

Don't change valid roads to cartpaths just so it shows up a particular way in your silly game while simultaneously leaving the map in poor condition.

OpenHistoricalMap is a good place to add "historical" features that no longer exist.

Do not map things that no longer exist. These features have been removed.

Don't double tag things. It should either be tagged in the building area, or tagged as a point, but not both. For example, Chase Bank:
osm.org/node/10054412051
osm.org/way/1098071987

Just pick one and go with it.

When adding crosswalks, such as:
osm.org/way/1103225859

It should be individual segments across each roadway. In this case, one E-W and one N-S. All the crosswalks shouldn't be connected like that.