OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
131251470 about 2 years ago

FYI, areas such as parking or leisure (shuffleboard, etc.) should not be tagged with "Area=yes". It is redundant for this type of feature.

139159396 about 2 years ago

When mapping areas, please don't have them partially overlap, like you have done for the fairways and the greens. They should either be attached to each other (and not overlap or one should be fully within the other.

139113729 about 2 years ago

Areas should not overlap. they should either be fully within another area, or not. There shouldn't be partial overlaps, such as what you have done with the "Rough".

139111752 about 2 years ago

You should utilize multipolygon relations instead of these haphazard landcovers.

114305307 about 2 years ago

Landcover shouldn't "lollipop". Multipolygon relations should be used instead.

111790509 about 2 years ago

Why no bridges for the cartpaths over the water?

139109580 about 2 years ago

Please use better changeset comments to describe what you did and why. Smashing your face into the keyboard to output random characters probably doesn't feel good and definitely doesn't help. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109580

87258987 about 2 years ago

This one doesn't exist... And has been removed

osm.org/way/820494841

118700851 about 2 years ago

Question is - should it be removed from OSM and added to OHM instead since it is no longer operational?

I am unsure if this means it is done for good, or permanently. It appears that it could be closed for good. For now, I changed it to access=no to reflect it being closed.

https://www.whites-ferry.com/press/whites-ferry-could-reopen-in-30-days?fbclid=IwAR2udO5NBSj70df7bajlOY3i4qfZNicyyhj5gnT5iEWcMPM8_Sk-D5oNDkY

https://www.facebook.com/WhitesFerry/posts/pfbid02qwZayTPCuaQ5Hv6PRTgQmeHnoEGztsVvoeQiNRdpowpzT7A8Rs9YMdLLmQ8HzPFvl

71142460 about 2 years ago

This is not a dog park:

osm.org/way/696392489

Resolved.

138989113 about 2 years ago

Do not use descriptive names such as "Restroom"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.

137962816 about 2 years ago

Do not use descriptive names such as "Tall Grass"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.

137850217 about 2 years ago

Do not use descriptive names such as "Long Grass"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.

137849919 about 2 years ago

Do not use descriptive names such as "Tall Grass"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.

137877535 about 2 years ago

Do not use descriptive names such as "Tall Grass". This changeset and others have been reverted in part or full.

138996124 about 2 years ago

Areas should not overlap, or if they do, the larger area should be fully enclosed. For example, I fixed this one:
osm.org/way/1192129272
They partially overlaped when you did it. The system can not determine which belong on top, so it throws error flags and alerts others that there is an issue.

There are 2 ways to do it:
1) Don't overlap. Have them either touch or not touch, but no overlap.
2) Have the "bottom"/"larger" one go completely around the smaller one. For example, how the tennis courts (smaller) are fully within the part area.

139004706 about 2 years ago

"private" features should not be deleted. They should be tagged with access=private instead. This changeset has been reverted. You can read more on why private features won't be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/139016760

138912423 about 2 years ago

Use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why? Quick comment goes a long ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138912423

138814845 about 2 years ago

Just because they are private doesn't necessarily mean they are service roads. They look almost like living streets, residential or alley.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138814845

138828050 about 2 years ago

updated old railways into cyclepaths as seen on aerial imagery.