What teacher and class required you to make the edits?

Thank you.

'Changeset reverted. Low Quality edit, assignment not completed with sufficient quality. Grade = C-

Please refer to: https://teachosm.org/'

osm.org/changeset/140552021

'Changeset reverted. Low Quality edit, assignment not completed with sufficient quality. Grade = C-

Please refer to: https://teachosm.org/'

osm.org/changeset/140552021

'Changeset reverted. Low Quality edit, assignment not completed with sufficient quality. Grade = C-

Please refer to: https://teachosm.org/'

osm.org/changeset/140552021

Changeset reverted.

osm.org/changeset/140551733

Changeset reverted.

osm.org/changeset/140551733

Also, use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why? "." tells me nothing.

Do not name houses "House". This is a descriptive name and not reflective of the actual house. This edit has been reverted.

that's not nice. The teacher will be consulted and the appropriate amount of points will be deducted. Great start to the school year...

I don't even know where to start. How about "Huh?!?" This isn't how you map a pond. I have corrected it. Take a look so you understand what to do in the future.

Got it.

Thanks for the feedback, I will have to correct them. I'll also check what the ID editor advises to make sure there isn't a conflict there against what the wiki says.

I am aware of the project and know it is to be completed in the distant future. While I am generally against mapping things that don't exist, this one is coming to fruition and construction has begun. (unlike those "razed"/"historic" railways that were completely demolished and removed, yet keep getting readded to the map by a few editors)

My issue is that it is tagged as layer=-3 and level=-3, even on the parts that are clearly going to be above ground or a bridge. This is clearly incorrect on the side by Secaucus Junction.

These buildings aren't even remotely close to being squared. You can use "q" to square the buildings. I encourage you to come back and square the buildings to make the data you tried to add even higher quality.

Also, these features are not golf courses... You need to use appropriate tags such as fairway, putting green, sandtrap, etc.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140504595

Also, these features are not golf courses... You need to use appropriate tags such as fairway, putting green, sandtrap, etc.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140504595

Features should not be named. I have removed the names.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140505149

Features should not be named. I have removed the names.

I went through and tried to get the ones I saw. So some are resolved.

For example:
osm.org/way/144177325

My comment was more just a "Hey, heads up, when you're mapping in the area, keep an eye out for this." Area looks good otherwise, just a friendly note to be on the look out. :D

I can't imagine contributing to OSM 11-12 years ago!

Do not map fairways and golf greens such that they partially overlap. One feature should be fully within the other, or there should not be overlapping at all. I have gone through and fixed it throughout this golf course.

Additionally, please use a more detailed changeset comment than "15-15" - what does that mean? It tells me nothing. A good changeset comment has what changed, why, etc.