Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also, the water area is not a water hazard. Tags should not be falsely added for a game or renderer.

Do not create "holes" by lollipopping the area, such as what you did on Hole 9. I have fixed this for you.

Do not partially overlap areas. I have fixed this. Please take a look so you understand how to do it in the future.

Also, do not partially overlap areas (as you have done for the green and fairway). They should either not overlap at all, or the smaller area should be wholly within the larger area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853

Please use more constructive changeset comments. What did you change? Why? Etc.?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853

Land covers should not partially overlap. (as you did with the fairways and greens). The areas should either not overlap at all, or the smaller one should be wholly within the larger area.

Additionally, do not "lollipop" areas by creating "holes" with thin extensions to create a fake hole.

I have corrected the errors. Avoid this in the future. Feel free to take a look at the changes to understand how it should be mapped.

Do not add features that partially overlap. This throws error flags. They should either not overlap, or one area should be wholly within the other.

I have resolved this. Please avoid this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141176971

Areas should not be partially overlapping. The smaller area should be fully within the other, or they should not overlap. Partial overlaps generate error flags since the database does not know which is the "top" area.

I have corrected this. Please observe and avoid doing this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141139381

Landcovers should not partially overlap, as you have done with the fairways and golf greens. The smaller area should be fully within the other, OR they should not overlap at all.

I have corrected this to resolve OSM error flags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141112481

Landcovers should not overlap as you have done with the fairways and greens. They ahould either not overlap at all, or one should be drawn completely within the other.

This will need to be addressed as the way it has been done creates an error with the database.

I highly recommend you attempt to fix it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140694977

What does "tarry" mean in your changeset comment? What did you change/alter in this changeset? Please use more detailed changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140695381

What is up with those random grassland areas that you added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140778359

These houses are super poorly drawn. Please take the time to be more accurate in drawing buildings. Additionally, the buildings should be squared using "Q" in the ID editor. Please come back and square these buildings, and make the ones that you mapped as pentagons in this changeset more reflective of their true shape.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140782156

What does "med" mean for your changeset xomment? What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140821360

I was having a hard time validating if it truly does wrap around the south and east side(s) of the house. I will have to take another look when I get home next week.

Thanks.

If the feature exists, they should still be mapped. Unnecessary to some, but not all. There are users mapping mamholes. I say unnecessary, but it actaully exists and can be verified, so it should be mapped (or at least remain).

osm.org/changeset/140877309