Looking at your changeset history, this does not appear to be a one-off. Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Looking at your changeset history, this does not appear to be a one-off. Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Looking at your changeset history, this does not appear to be a one-off. Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142994454

'This changeset has been reverted since it exists. Access tags should be used instead.

You can read why it won'"'"'t be removed here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/143049040

I reverted this changeset. It is already tagged as a driveway. An access tag of "private" can be used if it is on private property. Long driveways have a use on OSM.

osm.org/changeset/142735769

all the buildings added in this changeset need to be squared.

Residential buildings should be mapped as buildings, not landuse. Also, buildings should be squared.

'Changeset reverted. Access tags should be used instead of deleting ways. You can read more on why "private" trails/roads/features should be deleted here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.wiki/Key:access'

osm.org/changeset/142636949

power lines should not be connected to water bodies. I have fixed this for you here.

Any update on this "proposal" or whether construction is ever starting? Or is it still *just* a proposal with no action being done?

Do not incorrectly map things for your renderer.

osm.org/way/1215375059

This is NOT a building.

Don't create ficticious things just for your renderer.

osm.org/way/1215417739/history

You should review this page as you made several of the common pitfalls while editing this golf course:
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you do, and why? "yuyftyfu" tells me absolutely nothing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142493302

Also split highways/freeways/roads so Max Height tags can be added correctly/easily.

There is no gigantic building in the middle of a neighborhood. This changeset is being reverted. Please only map what is actually on the ground.

osm.org/changeset/142457845

You're continueing to map while making common errors. I encourage you to review the following to avoid making these type of errors in the future.

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have gone ahead and resolved some of the issues for you.

You're continueing to map while making common errors. I encourage you to review the following to avoid making these type of errors in the future.

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

'Access tags (Access=private) should be used instead where the paths still exist. You can read why "private" paths will not be deleted here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/142375690

Please close the notes you created when you updated this feature. Leaving notes open despite alreaxy resolving them is counterproductive to the community use of notes.

So if it is a forrest, yes, tree nodes should not be used. But in this case, you are trying to do something in detail, so rather than creating a bunch of tine "natural woods" areas the size of one tree, a node would suffice.

You probably read it here:
osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree#:~:text=species%3D*%20tag.-,Evolution%20of%20use,-Initially%20this%20tag

Nodes are acceptable in golf mapping, as long as it isn't excessive, such as mapping all the trees in a forrest as nodes, or using it where there are so many trees, you can't precisely (or close enough) place the individual nodes.

Also, welcome to OSM! Looking at the rest of the golf course, it seems you avoided most of the other common pitfalls when mapping a golf course. ( osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D* ) You are even using multi-polygon relations! Though, there isn't always a need for it.