This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Do not delete features that still exist. If you are updating the features, please just manipulate what is there to maintain revision history of the features.

osm.org/changeset/146162107

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

osm.org/changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

osm.org/changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

osm.org/changeset/146089738

'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

osm.org/changeset/146089738

Why did you delete the golf cartpath just to redraw it?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146086646

Features should not have descriptive names when there are better tags that can be used.

Do not purposely change lakes to water hazards. This is a lake, not just some golf feature. I have reverted this changeset in part or full to return this feature to a lake.

When mapping buildings, "Q" can/should be used to square the buildings.

Do not partially overlap landcovers. The fairway and green should not overlap. I have gone through and fixed this error.

Please review the following to avoid other common mistakes.
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146078455

Do not map things for test purposes on the live OSM map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146052623

Do not map things for test purposes on the live OSM map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146052670

This should not have been deleted. Access=private should have been applied instead. This is to prevent someone from completely readding it. If we tag it as private, then people will know it is added, etc.

I have reverted this changeset to readd it, and have added the private access tag instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146013392

What's up with consistently not adding the golfcart paths as a bridge over water? Like why end your cartpaths so abruptly?

I have fixed these for you, and have cleaned up other mistakes.

Why did you change the parking lot to a building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146012018

Where did you get the addresses from?

Do not add water features where water is already correctly mapped. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

Please do not delete features just to readd them. Revision history is lost.

osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

In the future, please just make the changes to the features that already exist, rather then deleting and creating a replacement item.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145975605

'Just because it is private does not mean it should be deleted. I have gone ahead and reverted this changeset.

Feel free to take a read here on why we won'"'"'t delete features:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/145972288

Hello,

OSM is what is on the ground. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding historical features, but that type of data belongs on OHM (Open Historical Maps):
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

Historical features do not belong on OSM if they no longer exist. In this case, lines tagged as historic=road where no road exists anymore (or recently) belongs on OSM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

I have gone ahead and removed these no longer existing features. I encourage you to instead add these features on OHM.