This house does not exist.

osm.org/way/809251492

Was any in-person verification or survey actually performed?

Any update?

Name seems sus.

Only features that currently exist should be mapped. Segments over roadways where the rails have been completely removed have been removed. Segments in trees where existence cannot be confirmed were left.

osm.wiki/Tag:railway=razed#:~:text=Mapping%20a%20feature%20without%20any%20physical%2C%20verifiable%20presence%20(Good%20practice%23Map%20what%27s%20on%20the%20ground)%20is%20considered%20out%20of%20scope%20for%20OSM

osm.wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned#:~:text=mapping%20of%20non%2Dexistent%20railways%20as%20incorrect

They reverted your changeset, so it will need to be changed back, again.

osm.org/changeset/147321589

ImJohn55, please stop. We know you are Bvonter23 based off of your IP and MAC address.

I'm on the fence about it. I removed it for now. Looks like it could be a ferry terminal, but idk, pier is good enough for now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147224833

You should not remove features just because they are private. Access tags should be used instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147313689

Please do not make changes just for your golf game. Mapping for the renderer is not allowed on OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307736

Why did you change these parking lots to underground buildings? What is the reason for this changeset?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307510

Please do not simulate holes like how you have done,

Please read:
osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together. You can read why it won't be deleted here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/147280635

This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together. You can read why it won't be deleted here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/147280635

ugh.... Do not add roads as a completely wrong classification just for your silly golf game.

please do not map for the renderer by adding things that don't exist...

Feel free to close the note once you resolve it. In this case, you added the building, so good enough for the note.

When editing the map after you left a note, please close out your notes...

osm.org/note/4104904

Yeah, I wouldn't have done it purposely. It's hard to tell if it is railway or light_rail from aerial mapping across the country.

Whoops. Must have fat-fingered it.

Reverted to readd that node:
osm.org/changeset/147196016

I'm trying to as I have time. Anything in particular?

No problem. Yeah, there are a number that are mapped incorrectly like that, and I have been trying to fix them, but it is hard to keep up sometimes. Once you get done with this one, feel free to make corrections to that one.

Thanks!