Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/152360902

Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/152360902

Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.org/changeset/152360902

Please do not delete driveways that are visible in aerial imagery. Readding them.

Ok. Cool. Just wanted to make sure it was all only one-way and not like 1 lane each way. :)

Happy mapping.

Is the bridge one-way only northbound?

There is no consensus - simply that. Some cases are best for the entire building, some are best as node within a building. And even then, there is no "right" way for single businesses within a building. Realistically, I don't care how it is mapped, as long as the "one feature, one element" rule is followed.

For example, look at the State Farm just to the north:
osm.org/node/11882064588

It isn't a reduction in quality or what not, it just an alternate way. To be clear, I didn't extract the data to a node to exert it as the "correct" or "superior" way. I just chose that as the easier method, especially since there was a duplicate address node on the building that I merged into the ACE node to resolve a duplicate tagging. I often find myself editing suburbs or urban areas where there are multiple businesses present within the same building and the node is a better fit than randomly splicing the building into random pieces that don't necessarily conform to real life.

But either way, thanks for changing it back and adding all the extra details like parking, building colors, trees, etc. Feel free to map or edit however you see fit - OSM's a community, and I'm proud to contribute regardless.

Happy mapping!

This is actually common practice. In thos case, the business may not occupy the entire building (building has multiple addresses), so it is better to map ad nodes within a building area.

All the info is there, it was just extracted to nodes. This is common practice, and for some is even the preferred method of mapping!

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/amenity-shop-better-use-node-or-area/81992/4

Before you make further changes, please read:

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

Do not partially overlap areas. Please review this webpage before making further edits! ::

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152062192

Is construction complete yet?

Also, do not "lollipop"

Do not partially overlap areas. I have resolved it for you here.

Please avoid this mistake in the future.

Do not partially overlap areas. I have resolved it for you here.

Please avoid this mistake in the future.

Do not partially overlap areas. I have resolved it for you here.

Please avoid this mistake in the future.

They did some other vandalism. I recommend referral to DWG

tests are not permitted on OSM.

changeset reverted

this isn't a golf course...

changeset reverted in part or full
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152050465

Read:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Changeset reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead.

osm.org/changeset/152051586

Welcome to OSM and edit looks acceptable.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152047745