Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278800

Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278821

Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278842

Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278890

Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278925

Hello. You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking. You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278870

User vandalized here.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143990420

Bad Changeset - vandalism of C/S and gas station.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139055327

Vandalism of names is not appropriate.

Looks like a good edit. Keep up the good work.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158219494

Blixt99 was reported to DWG for assistance. I have had multiple encounters with this user regarding their poor changesets.

I appreciate the input. I assumed it was a gantry for signage, not tolls and wasn't aware that OSM differentiated between the two. I will be sure to check the type and map differently, as appropriate.

I typically map man_made=gantry where they hold signs, not toll gantries. Looks like I added it as the wrong type. Ones for signs are mapped as ways across the road and not connected according to the wiki (different from toll gantries):

osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgantry

It states the following:
"Draw a line representing the gantry, using the base of the gantry as nodes. Just like you would with a bridge, do not connect the gantry to the way it is crossing"

This is not how addresses should be mapped....

What kind of business is "Watercolor Workout" ?

Abbreviation (PAC) will need to be expanded. "PAC NYC" should be the alternate. Essentially, alt_name= and name= should be swapped.

Name should not list bus lines. Name also shouldn't be descriptive with "Bus Stop".

Name should just removed since they aren't actually the name of the bus stop.

You can use "Q" to square the houses. They are all mapped with random angles but they should be cleaned up a bit.

Thanks for updating.

You don't need to add a name. You can just remove it. Names should only be the official name, and not descriptive, such as "(Empty)". I have updated it for you. :)

No clue. I recommend full reversion.

Hello. I kindly request you pause adding buildings at this time until further discussion. I'm trying to piece together feedback on how to proceed.

It appears you are just spamming random squares everywhere you see a building. While we want data on OSM, we want quality as well. The areas you are adding are not representative of their actual size or even alignment (why do they all face the same direction?). Furthermore, you are adding all of them as just 1 level, but with some spot checking this isn't always correct as some are observed to have 2 levels.

I'm not sure how to resolve this and move forward. Revert and add better quality from scratch? Make you adjust each one and correct it? I'm not sure. But to start, they should be realigned and size/shapes should be adjusted to the actual imagery of each house.

Copy/paste is not really OSM style. There are tools that can provide much better data than what you have done.

https://rapideditor.org/