What source did you use for this info?

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160927165

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160926691

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible.

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

osm.org/changeset/160926567

Hello. You got rid of the building? That doesn't seem right.

What jhaluska80 said. It's very frowned upon to snap/connect landuse/landcover to roads. makes it a PITA to update.

Looks like some railway tags were left on an orchard relation line:

osm.org/way/479388316

Changeset reverted. We use access=private to denote a road as private.

osm.org/changeset/160661976

When adding business names, do not describe what they make in the name. Unless of course, it is their official name.

I know, old changeset. But I'm just noticed it. :)

Good golf edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327226

Don't add tennis courts as buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327993

"Lollipopping" has been fixed. Use multi-polygon relations.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160329662

Do not add tennis courts as buildings. This is not just a whiteboard for your golfing game. This is a real map we use.

Please don't lollipop ways. If something has a "hole" in it, then a multipolygon relation should be used.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160330097

Welcome to OSM. Good edit.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160508471

Good edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160500704

Good edit
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160520801

Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote whether they are public or not. I can clearly see the roads from aerial imagery, so they should be mapped.

osm.org/changeset/160620247

Changeset reviewed. Good edit. Square buildings, good alignment to aerial imagery. Keep up the awesome work.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160320507

looks good
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160325062