My eyes might be deceiving men, but I don't see any water near here. This should not be tagged with random tags for whatever you are trying to do.

Fixed.

This is not a traffic calming table...

Please stop mapping things with random tags.

I have fixed this for you

As stated before, please use the right tags.

This is not a natural saddle.

correct tags are

man_made=geoglyph
inscription=B

Changeset fixed...

It should be

man_made=geoglyph

This isn't how you map it.

This isn't how you map this......

As mentioned before, please use the correct tags...

The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

Hello, and welcome to OSM! I wanted to drop a note. The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Also, make sure you follow the one thing, one feature policy on OSM. You created a node and a relation/way for the same feature. Only one should exist. Also, they should not be named, and the elevation certainly isn't 7m above sea level. Elevation tag should be corrected or removed.

Hello, and welcome to OSM! I wanted to drop a note. The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Additionally, it shouldn't be name=E, but instead, it should be inscription=E. The art is the letter E, which is an inscription, not the actual name.

You also mapped this as a line, you could make it an area. Name needs to be removed.

What do you mean by "its not there" in the fixme=* ?

Hello, and welcome to OSM! I wanted to drop a note. The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Additionally, it shouldn't be name=T, but instead, it should be inscription=T. The art is the letter T, which is an inscription, not the actual name.

Gotcha. Ok. I will mark it as a construction zone and see if I can find imagery with the new large buildings.

Thank you.

SEE:

osm.org/changeset/163504525

This changeset has been reverted. Here on OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to denote a road as private. Deleting removes all data, and when someone sees a road, they will likely readd it without access tags, and they cycle starts over. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

osm.org/changeset/163550662

This changeset has been reverted. Here on OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to denote a road as private. Deleting removes all data, and when someone sees a road, they will likely readd it without access tags, and they cycle starts over. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

osm.org/changeset/163550514

Why did you delete all the roads in the Twin Lakes Mobil Home Park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162821061

Good edit. :)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162957154

This changeset has been reverted. Here on OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to denote a road as private. Deleting removes all data, and when someone sees a road, they will likely readd it without access tags, and they cycle starts over. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

osm.org/changeset/163550074

Changeset reviewed as requested. Access should be "private" not "no". Updated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163434050

What source did you use for all the addresses? Specially, street names?