When adding address info, make sure you use unabbreviated street names. "S. Town" should be "South Town". I made the minor corrections.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166365339

Good edit
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166367011

Welcome to OSM. Good edit
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166367909

You can combine the areas and go across the roads, you don't need to divide it up by block.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166368029

Welcome to OSM. Good edit. Just make sure you aren't just copying addresses from Google since that is not allowed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166370525

It saved and is published! Welcome to OSM. Good edit.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166371128

Edit reviewed. Good edit. Welcome to OSM
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166372637

"Q" can be used to square these buildings and give them proper square corners.

Looks like you forgot to reopen the Westfield Blvd bridge when you tagged it as construction. I readded the road tag.

As a note, if you are going to map a temporary closure, it is requested (and expected) that you stay on top of it and update it promptly when it reopens.

Would you be able to respond to this note regarding this changeset with lane=-1 ?

osm.org/note/4752857

Please do not "glue" or attach landuse areas (construction area) to the roadways. It makes a mess to update.

"Road A" looks like a suspicious name. Is that the actual name or just a placeholder? A name should only be the actual name. Placeholders should not be used.

The name should not be descriptive. The name is only a name. I encourage you to review:

osm.wiki/Names#:~:text=apostrophe%2C%20one%20without.-,Name%20is%20the%20name%20only,-The%20names%20should

I have removed the name and instead added the address to the construction area.

Do not map buildings as an office just for your golf game.

Shoot. You're right. They should be. At least current links forward to ESS website.

https://www.extraspace.com/life-storage/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165827675

The Trader Joe's was already mapped about a month prior. Please do not map features that already exist!

These parking lot areas should be combined. It should be one large area that is connected to a roadway and encompasses almost all the parking spots. Individual spots can be mapped, but it should be individual, and not bunches of spots like this.

You can read up on it here:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking#:~:text=Each%20parking%20area%20feature%20should%20be%20mapped%20as%20a%20contiguous%20area

I made the same mistake when I first started mapping parking areas but have since gone back and corrected my errors and encourage you to do the same.

These parking lot areas should be combined. It should be one large area that is connected to a roadway and encompasses almost all the parking spots. Individual spots can be mapped, but it should be individual, and not bunches of spots like this.

You can read up on it here:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking#:~:text=Each%20parking%20area%20feature%20should%20be%20mapped%20as%20a%20contiguous%20area

I made the same mistake when I first started mapping parking areas but have since gone back and corrected my errors and encourage you to do the same.

These roads do not curve in intersections. Adding excessive nodes to "smooth/curve the road" when there is no actual curve in the road is not correct. For example, all the excessive "smoothing" you implemented at the below intersection implied that that the driver had to make a right-hand u-turn. Some simplicity is needed to align with the real world. Trying to emulate a complicated intersection with just one node is difficult no matter the mapper.
osm.org/way/1368856005

Furthermore, adding excessive nodes implies that the roadway curves, when it in facts doesn't. This is most significant around medians. The excessive nodes implies that the road S-turns, when in reality, the traffic continues going straight.

In another example, this intersection was mapped so heavily with all these excessive nodes to "smooth the curve", even though there was none that it provided incorrect navigation instructions and did not align with the real world.
osm.org/node/178381587

I try not to remove stop lights from the stop lines. My goal is to leave them where they are, but if they aren't present, I will add them where they cross. Both are considered acceptable, and I respect that. If I moved some where you had it the other way, I apologize - that was not my intention.

If the road is physically seperated by a median, it should be mapped as two seperate one way. I encourage you to review the following wiki:
osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway

I have reverted the changeset. Don't be discourage though - we've all started out new! :)

osm.org/changeset/165165556