What source did you use for the College Boulevard extension/new road? What is the timeline for this section to be constructed?

What source do you have for this new road?

What source do you have for the proposed Nardo Street?

There is not physical evidence everywhere. Who knows, it could have been an old road, or a power line, which would show up similarly. You can't prove any of it is correct as, again, there is no ground truth since nothing physical exists.

And again, any feature without a physical, verififiable presence is not good practice and is out scope for OSM.

And again, because this is being added for historical reasons, it should just be added to OHM, not OSM.

Ah, got it. Thanks for clarifying!

As mentioned in the other changesets in this area,

This railway, specifically the section over by Toms River does not exist. It has not existed in a very long time and has no remnants remaining to meet the definition of "abandoned railway" in regards to the OSM wiki.

Please do not map things that do not exist on OSM. If it is for historical purposes, please use the appropriate avenue, which would be OpenHistoricalMaps (OHM).

Please remove the railway that does not exist.

This railway, specifically the section over by Toms River does not exist. It has not existed in a very long time and has no remnants remaining to meet the definition of "abandoned railway" in regards to the OSM wiki.

Please do not map things that do not exist on OSM. If it is for historical purposes, please use the appropriate avenue, which would be OpenHistoricalMaps (OHM).

Please remove the railway that does not exist.

Most of the segments along this way do not meet the definition of an "abandoned Railway" in accordance with the OSM wiki, which states "where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure."

Additionally, "Expect anything mapped for historical purposes to be removed at a later date. See Open Historical Map for opportunities to map history."

Therefore, it is probably better to just add this to Open Historical Maps (OHM). A number of these areas have been completely overbuilt by houses and other buildings with no presence remainging.

I recommend reverting this changeset to only have what is physically on the ground, and instead mapping things purely for "historical" reasons only on OHM with the appropriate tags.

Source:
osm.wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

How is that multipolygon update going?

But what is weird is they show up under TIGER 2021. So I am not sure if construction is just planned and hasn't started yet?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131893295

You added a cartpath over a railroad track which does not exist. Please do not map and destroy the map for your little video game.

Reviewed - Looks Good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131794702

This feature does not exist and has been removed accordingly.

Also, please be more descriptive in your changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131825366

I have reviewed your edit as requested. Edits look good and are already active on the map. :D
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131878667

This isn't a tunnel the entire length of the way. Please correct to only have it tagged as a tunnel for the sections that are actually a tunnel.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131864326

Add of the country tag looks correct!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131861381

Changeset looks good. Cleaned up a couple tags to make them show up correctly on other apps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131872799

Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field. Changeset looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131887694

Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field. Changeset looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131886637

Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field. Changeset looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131887641