The state boundary is already there.

Any legit reason to map this?

osm.org/node/9072284523#map=19/39.72099/-76.66365

Junk removed.

osm.org/way/590307049

This footpath does not exist, removed.

osm.org/way/583522855/history#map=17/39.48356/-77.24641

This parking lot of a private home has been deleted. It does not qualify as such.

osm.org/way/591474379/history#map=19/39.48664/-77.24713

The "brilliant" idea of adding a no U turn has been deleted, it makes no sense.

osm.org/relation/11551710/history#map=19/39.57454/-76.42364

This is the name used by E911. Some information can be publicly found at:

https://www.susqco.com/departments/gis-mapping

This is the designated name from the county, you should not change just because it is US-11.

It is very common in PA to name them as state route, they even have the ref 0011.

This changeset is basically junk. Town road is not numbered by PennDOT.

Your name suggests that you live in MD or associate with MD, I recommend staying in MD of all your changesets unless you are clear of what you are doing here.

10ways+11nodes is not a large changeset, you can easily understand what I meant.

Fixed by myself.

They are considered as cell towers but not just the antenna

When does street lamps become towers?

It is this one.

osm.org/way/1268317809/history

> 99% of my edits are improvements to the map.

Are you saying you use the 1% to damage the map? I assume no, but let me know if you disagree.

> Some of the “junk” you removed were perfectly valid ways.

Yes, I removed that, and you can add it back. Not a big deal, the main one being removed is the non existent connector.

> Your adjustments to the roads are mostly tiny adjustments that make zero difference, especially compared to what was there before.

They make a big difference in higher zoom levels. You are describing an issue very common in those career GIS professionals, that you do not care much about details when it is out of your scope.

> If you spent as much energy on actually mapping areas that haven’t been touched in years instead of chasing my changesets, you could have improved the map a whole lot more than what you’ve done.

Yes, I have been doing this for years. Thanks for reminding me, you can check HDYC for the stats. Most of the TIGER cleanup of Susquehanna county is done by myself.

> Your comments are insulting and harassing.

Society works in a way that you can’t like everyone, and on the Internet it is amplified because we don’t know each other. Here at OSM I don’t use profanity to attack any person, I never have such attention as well. I don’t think the comment is harassing, considering the last time you disconnected the river for days, your name should have been mentioned already. If you don’t want to be mentioned, just map with no major issues.

> you need to leave me alone.

I would like to do that when you start to map with no major issues, you are doing better and hopefully you will graduate from the list when the bad habits from your GIS career go away.

osm.org/node/7524694498#map=16/41.9112/-75.8632

Is this the real name?

You must not add non-existent road.

osm.org/way/1268317809#map=19/41.93595/-76.18928

If you run cleanup then name_1 needs to be taken care of. Either unsigned_ref or alt_name.

Also you must not use PennDOT to verify the name of road not maintained by the state. PennDOT is not responsible for the data accuracy of them.

osm.org/way/10721932/history#map=15/41.9475/-76.1578

Put the source in your changeset comments.

osm.org/way/1087795759/history#map=19/41.65732/-76.04894

Wellsites cannot be mapped like that.

osm.org/way/1264984976#map=18/41.89794/-75.68804

Spam removed

osm.org/way/499776871#map=19/41.95772/-75.82845