Hi,
because of the comment in this ( osm.org/user/Detructor/diary/1709#comments ) thread from TomH I wanted to ask if it is allowed to use online map sites (such as http://maps.google.com ) to get the name of a street?!
greetings
detructor
OpenStreetMap
Hi,
because of the comment in this ( osm.org/user/Detructor/diary/1709#comments ) thread from TomH I wanted to ask if it is allowed to use online map sites (such as http://maps.google.com ) to get the name of a street?!
greetings
detructor
การอภิปราย
ความคิดเห็นจาก andrewpmk เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 08:08 น.
Absolutely no. You must visit them yourself. Copying from Google or other online map sites constitutes copyright infringement.
ความคิดเห็นจาก Detructor เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 08:21 น.
wait, you get me wrong:
I track the streets myself.
But often I forget the name of the street or I can't remember exactly.
Can I visit (in this case) maps.google.com and take (only!!!!) the name(!) of the street?
ความคิดเห็นจาก PhilippeP เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 08:25 น.
No , because of the copyright crap ... and because of the voluntary errors found in these...
(In any case , cross referencing is always best ...)
ความคิดเห็นจาก Detructor เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 08:37 น.
?so the map creators have a copyright on the names of the streets?
...in that case I don't can insert any name into OSM...
ความคิดเห็นจาก photohiker เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 08:43 น.
Sure you can. Just record the name of the street as you track it with your GPS. Pencil and paper, photo or audio will all work.
ความคิดเห็นจาก Detructor เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 09:10 น.
but...as Phillippe wrote "No , because of the copyright crap"
so if the online map services have a copyright on the street names, I can't insert them into OSM...there is no difference between the names at the online map service and the names at the streets...if on one is a copyright, it is on the other, too.
ความคิดเห็นจาก TomH เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 09:14 น.
This is a very complicated area - in theory the name of the street is a fact and not subject to copyright. It is however subject to database right in countries (like EU countries) which have that - database right protects a collection of data even if that data is factual and making a substantial extract (for some value of substantial) of that collection of data is not allowed.
In addition there is the problem that these mapping site will put in deliberately misnamed streets and things to detect copying - those incorrect names are arguably not facts and hence subject to copyright protection if you copy them.
The critical point however is that it doesn't really matter what the law actually says - if the site you are using wants to start a legal argument then we can't afford to defend ourselves so we have to avoid doing anything that might even possibly lead to such an argument.
ความคิดเห็นจาก SuborbitalPigeon เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 11:54 น.
The only reason the real name and the copyrighted map's names are supposed to be the same is because their map's right for that particular road.
Just because someone says that the road I live on is "Montrose Drive", doesn't mean any knowledge of that name is also under copyright.
ความคิดเห็นจาก PhilippeP เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 12:37 น.
Cross referencing from different map services(look that they don't use the same source provider , there's not a lot of them) , and paper maps (a lot of municipalities, cities gives those to their residents) should filter the Copyright Easter Eggs out ...
ความคิดเห็นจาก spaetz เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 13:28 น.
1) Yes it's debatable whether the fact that a street is "miller street" is copyrightable
2) What is not debatable is that drawing (even public domain) data in large amounts out of somebody elses database is prohibited in some areas of the world. So there you go already.
3) What is also not debatable is that if you copy somebody elses mistakes from a map (and there are plenty) then you break their copyright
4) Their Terms of Service plainly prohibit derivative works. You could argue that this is invalid, bu you don't want to be sued by Google, even if you are right.
5) It's just much more fun (and healthier) to go out and check the streetnames yourself.
ความคิดเห็นจาก Detructor เมื่อ 27 พฤษภาคม 2008 เมื่อเวลา 14:12 น.
2nd yes, I know
3rd I know
4th ;) yep^^
5th hmmm...it is not healthie when you track street with a high amount of traffic ;) or try to read the ****** ** streetnames (need new glasses...but I'm to lazy to buy new glasses)
ความคิดเห็นจาก smsm1 เมื่อ 1 มิถุนายน 2008 เมื่อเวลา 20:34 น.
Alternatively buy a camera with a good zoom lens (e.g. 10x zoom) and then you can take a picture and zoom into it on the computer (or camera) to read the name. I use a Panasonic DMC-TZ3, which is excellent for reading signs that I can't read due to the sin being too far away.
ความคิดเห็นจาก Detructor เมื่อ 1 มิถุนายน 2008 เมื่อเวลา 20:51 น.
I've a camera...but the problem is here in GermanyN/Niedersachsen you often don't have a sign at secondary roads...and even no number...