From wiki for tiger:reviewed:

"For various reasons, mappers did not follow this procedure consistently enough for the key to mean much on a large scale, though some mappers continue to use the key to track their personal reviewing progress locally."

tiger:reviewed are largely irrelevant as tagging goes. 90% of smith county is done with the remainder in progress, so in another couple of week, this will be consistent.

note that this was NOT an automated edit.

work in progress.. They will be cleaned up in a couple of days.

Probably an oversight during the creation of the riverbank relation. Thanks.

I will correct this shortly

My apologies. I should have done more research. I'll revert this momentarily.

The whole area was compared against the 2015 Tiger data and the Adams County GIS system (where streets stop/start based on parcel address, etc). The original TIGER data is inaccurate and gets mashed up over time and the ZIP data is pretty useless (esp with zip_right_1, zip_right_2, etc..).