logo OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Kapan Komentar
102764697 sekitar 4 tahun yang lalu

From wiki for tiger:reviewed:

"For various reasons, mappers did not follow this procedure consistently enough for the key to mean much on a large scale, though some mappers continue to use the key to track their personal reviewing progress locally."

102764697 sekitar 4 tahun yang lalu

tiger:reviewed are largely irrelevant as tagging goes. 90% of smith county is done with the remainder in progress, so in another couple of week, this will be consistent.

note that this was NOT an automated edit.

97584822 lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu

work in progress.. They will be cleaned up in a couple of days.

58625657 lebih dari 6 tahun yang lalu

Probably an oversight during the creation of the riverbank relation. Thanks.

62257087 hampir 7 tahun yang lalu

I will correct this shortly

46653618 lebih dari 8 tahun yang lalu

My apologies. I should have done more research. I'll revert this momentarily.

42257527 hampir 9 tahun yang lalu

The whole area was compared against the 2015 Tiger data and the Adams County GIS system (where streets stop/start based on parcel address, etc). The original TIGER data is inaccurate and gets mashed up over time and the ZIP data is pretty useless (esp with zip_right_1, zip_right_2, etc..).