Can you help correlate the name of osm.org/node/7261473547with osm.org/node/8960832178

Hi, what happened or are both (osm.org/changeset/108154919) of you trying to achieve by creating 100+ changesets on same way within few minutes?

Kindly clarify.

Hi, what happened or are both (osm.org/changeset/108161087) of you trying to achieve by creating 100+ changesets on same way within few minutes?

Kindly clarify.

I have moved this node to the nearest building that looks more like a church, could you kindly review/confirm/revert. Thank you.

Hi, Kindly take note of existing data and imagery offsets when adding new data; especially when using Imagery from Maxar.

See https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/

What happened with data alignment from osm.org/node/8916293701 heading North?

Was close attention paid to existing data and offset between imageries?

Please kindly explain.

Could you please avoid deleting simple features that could be preserved, if you have no idea see the "Replace Geometry" function of "utils2plugin", see https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/

Also, follow good changeset comments practices osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments by avoiding so many hashtags that does not give any information about what you did.

Hi Samuel, welcome to OpenStreetMap. What are you trying to achieve?

How did you come to this conclusion, osm.org/way/747871211 ? Having been here so many years ago, I can tell this is NO `ford=yes` and cannot be traversed by motor vehicles. A close look at publicly available and accessible OSM imagery tells you there are boats on the river banks. Can you clarify this?

I am sorry, this seems false positive and shouldn't be the reason for re-classification as `tertiary`. The way I referenced leads nowhere from osm.org/node/4698223484 but continues to be classified as `tertiary`.

Furthermore, the main road via the interchange have been completed and opened to traffic recently, but I will wait for public and accessible imagery/references to draw a conclusion on which way is connected, used or not, thanks.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Here are some resources to help you
- https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
- https://learnosm.org/

Furthermore, only trace footprints of buildings instead of entire compound as a building. I hope this helps

Hi Denison, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I am curious if the "Drone images" used for reference could be made public via https://openaerialmap.org/. Furthermore, instead of deleting existing objects and trying to redraw them completely, kindly use utils2plugin's "Replace Geometry" function; see https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/

Please take note of the Imagery offset with Bing and existing data. Use the osm.wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database plugin to find out about offsets saved by others.

On what basis are you classifying this osm.org/way/476181926 and other?

Where is this reference imagery used? And wondering how your team decided to connect a residential road to motorway 2 years ago too osm.org/way/637555403/history?

This is over 4 years, I believe you can fix them now, kindly use "Replace Geometry", See #4 https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/ on how it works. And here is an example https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/472108318

Could clarify what you are trying to achieve with these De minimis changesets that seems not add anything useful?

Some roads here needs not to be deleted. Bing looks most recent in this area. Compare other imagery with osm.org/way/965268331

Please, can you check and update the name to "<Location> Police Station", thank you :)

Please, adjust imagery offset instead of moving existing data, see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/29474768